Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, they look good to me.

You could look at deleting the previous address node for 18 March Place now that you have put the address on the building. Also you could connect the parking lot to March Place with a service way.

To follow the NZ OSM community you can look at talk-nz (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz just created and very quiet) or it's predecessor at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis

If they are used by cars then they shouldn't be tagged as paths - they are probably service roads. They definitely should not intersect building and need to be joined to the adjacent roads

Reviewed against LINZ and ESRI imagery and looks good

I can confirm there is a playground here, visited in 2017.

No additional paths needed, just move the end nodes of the existing paths so they are also part of the roads.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. It looks like the paths you added need a bit of clean up:
1) Some of them appear to be service roads and not paths
2) They are crossing buildings
3) Not connected to the roads

These paths look like they should be connected to the nearby roads - as they stand they cannot be used for routing.

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

Bridges tagged according to bridge=* following this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/nzopengis/TLcY6KL-tFE

I'm definitely no tagging expert but I wouldn't of thought they are needed and there don't seem to be any other examples using that combination of tags.

Seems strange that this is being rendered to look like it is above ground though. Is it to try and not render it that layer was changed to -5?

Should this be tagged "covered=yes" ? (as per landuse=reservoir)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. As previously discussed there are some issues with your changesets in this area. Will yoube able to fix up the issues? (Nodes shared between unrelated ways; overlapped buildings with strange shapes; dubious council reserve; Cambrai park has a building in ESRI imagery; swimming pools not in imagery; park that just appears to be a front yard etc.)

Are you sure this is a residential road? It looks to be a driveway to me.

Is this really a park? from the ESRI aerial imagery it looks to be a household back yard.

Are you sure about a park being here? The ESRI photo imagery shows residential buildings

Inadvertently combined 2 changesets in JOSM, this also incorporates changes to reflect the extension of Herdman Street, Waterview which is under construction.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Strange but correct that the road is Green Lane while the suburb is Greenlane. Well spotted.