Thanks for addressing that.

Please dont put descriptions like "Access track (approx only)" in the name fields - it is for genuine names only: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97590515

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing instead of the service road and the track connecting to the car park polygon they should be extended to meet inside the polygon. in this way routers will make the connection.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97525656

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - unfortunately a POI for a park run does not belong in OSM. As a map only physical entities that can be verified on the ground should be added. See the on-the-ground rule at osm.wiki/How_We_Map
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97402934

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A quick pointer: many buildings in NZ consist only of 90 degree corners. You can enforce this in the Id editor by selecting the outline, right clicking and choosing "Square" (shortcut "Q").
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97246105

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please be careful and look out for warnings from the editor - this change dragged a node of Fernham Way to the South, I've fixed it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97248502

The Caltex fuel station is already tagged and has been for over 4 years, please don't create duplicates
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96563317

That looks better, thanks for that

Then it gets a bit fuzzy. My approach is to map as a seperate way if the gap is roughly >4m or not strictly parallel but it's a value judgement.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96030844

Rather than adding sidewalks as seperate ways the preference in NZ is to add a sidewalk=left|right|both to the assocaited road way. This makes maintaining consistent topolotgy a lot easier. See sidewalk=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96030844

Thanks for fixing
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95022314

Can you please point out an additional source (online, photo, business registration etc) that confirms this business name and location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93451880

This does not appear to be the actual name of the business, please use the name tag for actual names only. Also please look at the wiki (osm.wiki/) for guidance of the format for opening hours and phone number as these are not correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95892694

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing - as well as changing the highway tag to cycleway you should also remove construction=cycleway. Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95869328

Yes, that sounds correct

Some of the footways are tagged with layer=-1 but they are visible in aerial imagery. Please see layer=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95782577

Thanks, for replying. Not sure how to revert in Id but JOSM has a revert tool. Otherwise just move the new node back to the original position.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146

Why have you moved Flax Point? The original location matches the LINZ Topo 50 maps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146

The restaurant exists already, you may have been using an old map
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91733907

Is that genuinely the name of the shop or your opinion?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95644198