REVIEW: Hi welcome to OSM, thanks for your edit, it looks good to me. A couple of improvements you could make: instead of the description field you could put "Kowhai Forge Ltd." in the name tag and add a "craft=blacksmith" tag

Deleted by james2185

Do you have a source for this? From the aerial it does not appear to be a park and the name seems suspicious as well.

Can I ask what the source for this name is? It looks like naming an individuals house based on their name which is not good practice. Thanks.

Why have you changed this from a swimming pool to a pond? From the aerial imagery it definitely appears to be a pool. Also please use desciptive changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please don't use OSM to map fantasy or joke elements

What is your source for these changes? They do not appear to be supported by aerial imagery and your changeset description gives no information on the change or it's source.

please don't change the names to reflect fantasy elements and please use descriptive comments on your changesets.

That should have been "lies" not "lised"

Thanks for the edit. The city tag is not required (and not used in the LINZ imports) as it can be derived from the fact that the node lised within the boundary of the city. The LINZ ref should not be added if the node is not imported from LINZ as it is used to tie imported data back to the source so it can be maintained. I.e. you did everything right, thanks.

Do you have a source for this?

I have removed this, please don't use OSM to map fantasy elements

Review: Edit looks good to me, thanks

No problems, thanks for fixing

Hi, you've managed to create this building as two seperate areas with a split down the middle which doesn't seem to match the aerial imagery. Also most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners. In ID the command "Square" (shortcut key: Q) will make the angles 90 degrees.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Just one thing to note, there was already an existing node with the address information for 12 Easton Way. You could have merged that with the building outline instead of creating duplicate information for number 12.

This changeset also placed kerbs accross street ways etc. Reverted by changeset/73257261.

Please do not create fake buildings and please use meaningful comments for you changes

Review: Is this really a footway that is visible on the ground or just a shortcut accross the grass? It appears to be the latter in the aerial imagery. If it is just a short cut please dont map it as a footway - maybe (if at all) use highway=path and trail_visibilty=no

Review: Looks good to me