Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. With the address tags please don't put all the details (road name, suburb, postcode) etc. in the addr:street tag, there are seperate addr:suburb and addr:postcode to hold the other details. Also abbreviations such as "Rd" should be expanded. Thanks.

Updated tags

Are you sure Morningside Church Of Christ is at the correct location? All the other address nodes (mostly imported from LINZ) suggest that 42 is the other side of the road (where there is a # 42 already)

Hi there, when adding nodes instead of putting the information in the name like "Freedom Camping Self-Contained 3 nights" can you please just put the actual name in that tag and put the other info in seperate tags, e.g. "fee=no" and use the description for anything else. Thanks.

Awesome, thanks for that.

Thanks for responding. Maybe change leisure=park to landuse=grass?

Maybe use leisure=track and attaction=summer_toboggan (see leisure=track and attraction=summer_toboggan)

Cleaned up

Cleaned up

Hi wlecome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Do you have a verifiable source for your changes? I ask because you have added a park that does not appear in the Auckland Council park extents data set and appears from aerial imagery to in fact be private land. Thanks, Rob.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. A pointer: in the ID editor you can right click and select "SQUARE" (Shortcut 'Q') to set all the building angles to 90 degrees which is generally correct for many NZ buildings.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a couple of points: please don't put descriptions like "playground" in the name field (see name=*). In this case you could create a seperate area tagged with lesiure=playground. Also can you please use more descriptive changeset comments (see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments).
Thanks.

Thanks for the quick response, I'll edit the tags.

This path (and various others) is tagged as access=no and foot=yes which is contradictory, is it open to the public to walk?

Both graphhopper and OSRM are routing correctly so the underlying data looks fine now: osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=-36.87474%2C174.73495%3B-36.87500%2C174.73520

Updated buildinbg outline

No response so I've undone this at it appears to be vandalism

I've changed tagging as per my suggestions

Changed back to swimming pool by james2185

What app/router are you using that is attempting to route over the train tracks? I ask because the edits you have made are being flagged as wrong by QA checkers such as OSMOSE and from my understanding shouldn't be required. Thanks.