Maxar is newer than bing! - So the buildings are probably still there. Because the industrial area was redrawn, the name was lost.
way/216781459/history

Opel=no

Hello, could you please tell me why you choose this project? And why did you draw these ugly polygons over existing passable data?

Thank you

Hello,
i picked up some exsample of your recent changes here. Please review your work and fix the issues.

Not recangular, connected to another building
way/835963762

Overlapping, not rectangular:
way/835963757

Wrong shape and size:
way/835967083

Hello,
you missed to modify the turn:lanes

way/31982440
is now primary.
All other parts of route A1 are tagged as trunk. Please reconsider this change

Hello,
Please do not limit your mapping to the silly Tasking Manager tiles. The paths you have added are routing islands. When adding a road, always make sure that it is connected to the existing road network. If you had done so, you would have noticed that
way/834622796
and
way/834622803 are actually water bodies that should be extended to
way/559811773

Hallo,
Vielleicht hilft das hier halbwegs weiter:
osm.wiki/DE:Key:traffic_calming

"Fixed the 2 you mentioned. I have no green border to define area so I don't know where "lower left corner" is. LOTS of things unmarked in other areas."

don't worry, its really looking good now

Hello, Robert,
I'm not a validator, but I'd say it looks pretty good to me now. If you want to do it perfectly, you can remove two remaining leftovers:
way/831443869
way/405215243
There are also two unmapped roofs in the lower left corner and some in the center. It is always advisable to use different imagery sources. You can determine the most recent layer and view the scene from slightly different angles. If you want to keep the original data and history, you should try JOSM. It has an advanced building tool and a "replace geometry" tool. With JOSM you can also hide the data layer. I always do this in confusing mapped places where the data obscures reality.

Hi,
there are some overlappig buildings now. Please try to fix it. Can you tell me something about the used amazon imagery. Is it legal for use in OSM?

Hallo,
hier gehören keine turn_lanes hin.
Ich nehme an es ging dir hier um erweiterte Abbiegehinweise. Die habe ich jetzt mal mit destination direkt an die Straßen gesetzt
Gruß
Ralf

osm.wiki/DE:Key:destination

Hi,
It looks as if you have accidentally dragged the border.
I guess it should follow the river and or must be located north and east of the fence line.
Please try to fix it.
Thanks

way/157303419

two parking cars:
way/829883592

another parking car:
way/829894083

recommendation: use more then one imagery layer

Hi,
bing has the higher resolution but maxar is more recent. I would use both.
(shortkey "b")

sorry,
but here is everything wrong.
please check your additions with the maxar imagery

Mit Kanonen auf Spatzen schiessen? Given the fact that the track type of nearby roads was added 10 years ago, we might also have a problem with pretending a high accuracy.
But all in all, comparing roads with given track type with nearby roads in the same area, on the same image. Then the results of couch mapping could be well in the range of local knowledge additions.

wrong imagery!
Please try maxxar.
So many "highway=residential" on such a small area always look a bit suspicious

something is wrong here
node/6476264895
node/6476264783