https://www.instagram.com/p/CkfeQ2LtTtK/?hl=en

The graffiti on two sides is a single mural.

way/1132048440

IMO this micromapping looks overdone

>Do you mean you would prefer having those tiny blue arrows in cyclosm instead of the blue lane? To be honest, after months using cyclosm, never noticed that these little arrows indicate a bicycle lane.

Well, maybe way/502506189 looks better

But it's important that it's not duplicated, separate way is ok too.

>I would consider that this is indeed a protected bike lane

Well, it's not protected if there is no protection. If someone is distracted by a phone or a child on the backseat at 40km/h and crashes into oncoming bike at 25 km/h that kerb will do absolutely nothing (And opposite directions are like 1 meter apart since you have ride at the right side)

* cyclemap doesn't really show it. But it's never as detailed as cyclosm.

Hi, the cyclepath already exists as a part of the street way/76990101#map=17/59.43811/24.78405

You can see it on cyclosm and cyclemap

I prefer it that way because it's not protected from car.

Anyway, now it's duplicated. Please remove one of them :)

Hi, you've added a fixme
"it looks that no access for cars from the road sign but there are cars on the road"

The access is forbidden for buses and motorcycles and the tags were correct. I've restored them. At least from the Jaan Poska side the signs say so.

You've accidentally added a hedge here way/769134690
I'll remove it, but be careful and check your changes.

I've rollbacked your changeset and re-added the cafe.

Be careful next time!

Hi,
you've very clearly broken a building by accident. When you've broken something and don't know how to fix it's better to just try again than upload mistakes. The warnings before upload are also a tip that something went wrong.

Hi, there are some imports by Asumarin where pharmacies overrode shops and amenities.

changeset/88550788
changeset/90342150

In this import it's easy to see that at least Põhja Rimi Apteek is also a shop. The pharmacy should be extracted (there is already a node for it) and shop's tags returned.

It would be nice if you'd fix this and at least review what you're importing, implement an automated check for this and retroactively check your older imports too.

Please check all the warnings before upload.

* way/26897630
The prettiest graffiti on this power substation is on the back, from where you've removed it. I recommend checking it out if you didn't notice it. Please don't change something you didn't see and verify.

If possible, please keep your changesets as geographically localized as possible. The house construction in Haapsalu makes this changeset look big.

Thanks, part of this road was supposed to be a footway. At least it looked like one from one side. But I didn't notice that the way is that long and includes a clearly car road.

See if it looks correct now

footway part:
way/9917256

service part:
way/1146469651

Hi. Which road exactly?

In the end I've named it EE:EHIS:type. I find that it better conveys hierarchical connection between the 3 words.

Hi, I think this can still be a building
building=bridge

>So, for that photo I'd say yes, it's a garden

Wow, really interesting how our views can be so different! In my opinion this is not a garden in any way, though it may include a garden if the residents create one.

Would you map every lawn on residential property as a garden? Residents may decide to plant something there. Or pave it with asphalt... It's also not like you can do much relaxation on this small strip of grass. I really cannot distinguish it from any other "random piece of grass between roads"

Is this a garden?
https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/etak.php?B=59.444315920251086&L=24.87756648969829&fotoladu

It's not really important for me if you want to keep this as a garden, just my opinion.

I don't think we should tag what can be there instead of what is there on the ground. What's the problem with grass? If I remember correctly then one potential problem is that the most common way to tag lawns is by landuse and it's correctness is questionable.

Isn't this just a lawn?