qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 163017459 | I've surveyed the tap. It doesn't seem to work at the moment. Still, it exists and should be tagged a disused: lifecycle prefix and maybe disused=yes tag. Maybe it only works in the summer. |
|
| 163063180 | @Mart Raudsepp
maxspeed=70
I don't see why it was changed though, maybe there was missing speed limit added in some other place and this was made consistent with it. But I'd prefer if we'd use the one which is both lower and during which more cars pass as the main one for simple data consumers. |
|
| 163017459 | Hi, could you explain why was this POI removed? |
|
| 163063215 | How is this a fix? |
|
| 161816657 | My opinion is that everything which can have an address, can have it in OSM. And those barns have an address. It would be incorrect to remove the correct data. Search isn't the only way to use OSM data. We could add a new tag for the main building. Also, remember that cafes, shops can be mapped separately from the building and can have an address too, which will duplicate the address of the building. |
|
| 162168972 | Hello, it may be not productive to change coastline back and forth depending on when aerial imagery was taken. Wiki suggests using high tide. |
|
| 162138973 | Maybe it's better to use streams instead of drains? Those are natural, as I understand. |
|
| 161892913 | Hi, as you've specified, it's an office, not a shop where customers actually walk in and see products. I've removed the shop tag and tagged it as an office. |
|
| 161906097 | Not sure why you're changing one incorrect address to a more incorrect one https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=CU03702219 fixed. |
|
| 161756648 | building=retail only says what kind of building it is, what's it's built for or architectural type. It's actual use may differ. For shops, add shop=* tag with appropriate value |
|
| 161756499 | Adding it to bus stops isn't very useful though. Also, often bus stop can serve buses from different networks, for example lines between cities alongside inner city buses. |
|
| 161754641 | There is also a footway visible to the North of the parking lot. I'd recommend adding it and connecting it to the road which should go through the parking lot. |
|
| 161754641 | The building shouldn't be marked as amenity=kindergarten at all, since the kindergarten is already mapped as an area. When possible, mapping the territory is preferred. The parking lot type surface would be more correct than lane. should be leading up to it, not a footway It also should go right through the middle of the parking lot to allow routing. |
|
| 161756499 | Hi,
|
|
| 161725189 | I'd also tag such small low height free to use parks as instead of but see for yourself |
|
| 161725189 | Hi, see if this would be a better (and more widely used) value for the sport tag |
|
| 161484049 | added |
|
| 161446386 | Thanks, I've also changed the road type to track. It doesn't seem to be a continuation of the actual street, just a forest road. Correct me if I'm wrong. |
|
| 161409039 | Hi, your pizza place looked correct in the sense of data it had, but since it's a fake place, I've removed it. There is A LOT missing from OSM.
Explore and see which real changes you can do. |
|
| 161429456 | The building already has an addr:housename=Ämari lennuväli
name=Ämari lennuväli means that this building is an airfield, which is wrong. |