I've removed cycleway from that part of the path

I agree. I don't even see segregation, but maybe imagery is outdated, bicycle parking looks a lot smaller there too.

I'd say there are cases when two ways are ok. When the road is segregated and really wide. Like here
way/858682902

or some parts here when they come together
way/1191470364

But in this case it looks strange.

Paths are used by all routers I know of which support cycling routing since it's an old convention. Do you have an example of router which doesn't? I think Komoot, organicmaps, brouter, osmand all support paths.

I'm not up for reverting things back and forth without a reason. It's not incorrect, but also not more correct.

*on the ground

Tallinn's map is a fantasy map. In the ground bridge connection to the western part is not designated at all.

Hi, please don't change
highway=path
to
highway=cycleway

highway=path is regarded as a more correct value for combined bicycle-pedestrian paths by some mappers and we don't want edit wars.

Here are some tips on mapping cycleways in Estonia

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894/4

Please always check for warnings before saving. On the junction you've changed here node/81587170#map=19/59.31236/24.63114 cycleway is not connected to carrigeways it crosses. No routing software would be able to plot a route with a switch from cycleway to carrigeway or vice versa

Is bridge over Ehitajate tee really a cycleway? I don't remember any signs there. Western descent from it is definitely not designated and may proove challenging for some people and some tires.

Nice!

When editing, make sure you aren't removing some else's work and details.

way/486295059

Here, crossing-related tags were removed.

Multiple footway=sidewalk were removed. It's ok to leave them even if it's not a "footway" anymore.

Has anything been changed here?

aerial imagery from March suggests that everything is in place

https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/etak.php?B=59.35221346053511&L=24.61018345038208&fotoladu

Hi, adding name to this path
way/1225910801
is probably accidental

Hi, do you know if this can be deleted?
node/4242321443
it seems that goods are delivered on ship's deck
https://fi.tallink.com/ostosristeilyt-tallinnaan-old

Hi, do you know if this can be deleted?
node/4242321443
it seems that goods are delivered on ship's deck
https://fi.tallink.com/ostosristeilyt-tallinnaan-old

Hi, does the Uus turg area behind Estonia really count as Tammsaare park? What's the source for this?

also, please avoid changing paths to cycleways for combined bicycle-pedestrian paths

Hi, accidental ford here
node/11362460579

Hi, you've accidentally made this building a 123-storey tower

And maybe I'd remove
access=no
since it doesn't functionally add anything, but the osm.org standard map renders it in gray because of it.

* I doesn't GET as wet and sticky as dirt.

I think dirt is incorrect. Surface on such tracks is usually woodchips or woodchips with fine gravel and ground. I doesn't as wet and sticky as dirt.

I've also wondered if such tracks should be tagged as

leisure=track
sport=running

In the end I've decided not to add it at all for simplicity, but what do you think? There are more of them around here.