Good tip, thank you

Just moved to "name"

Totally agree with you 👍

finally the benches 👍

Thank you!

Looks like I screwed up my changeset title

yes that's a good idea, go for it :)

also I've changed the shape of the park just now as it was mapped across a part which is private land.

I'm not sure what's the best leisure/landuse tag to use for this "Park", you probably got a better suggestion than leisure=park ?

I've not been back in 3-4 years, but I believe that it's a public space made of 75% concrete, 25% grass,
and indeed called Armada Green Park, but it's not trying to compete with Thames Barrier Park, it's quite rough.
There's a footpath there going along the Thames, part of the Capital Ring.

you can see the name being used here for example : https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6405346

The name "Armada Green Park" may have been deprecated since, I'm not sure.

I was wrong.
I've added the name + website of the structure.

hi - is this area really industrial ?
way/874780132
I went past it a few days ago and I thought it was the core of a tower being built ?

regarding imagery, the new outline I draw is correct, I live close by

fixed via changeset/90018863

you're making a good point, I wasn't sure how to fix the pre-existing problem, some shops under residential buildings were recorded like the whole building is a shop.
The shops under buildings should be recorded as a point.
I'll move the previous details regarding to the buildings from the shop object to the building object for these 5 ways.

Should the VeloPark and the BMX track also be removed from the park itself, aka reducing the park area?

Thanks for the extra note tags. I've noticed that the new Kidbrooke + Fulham Riverside developments are using the same kind of covered parkings.

sorry I don't have any updates related to that area, I've just tweaked the shape of the land from what I remember...

I don't think it should be set as "construction" but "brownfield" instead ?

Indeed they're not part of the park anymore

LGTM