Hi James, no worries, thought you might not have come across the GPS traces. Did them a lot in the early days, but there's a lot of Medway area roads without. Imagery has got better over the years, and they've got better at matching it up to map projections. Can still be some metres different though.

Hi. Most of these roads have GPS traces I did years ago. Don't think the roads have moved though. Imagery can be a bit off, so I've preferred GPS trace generally. Paul

Thanks - corrected those. Had planned to use comparison between current rating date and old ones to plan survey trips, but haven't yet managed to wrangle the xml into usable form. Annoyingly, some authorities change the fhrs:id when ownership or management changes, so users can't pick that up easily.

Corrected this and checked through the changeset for others

Hi Dave: That's a error.Thanks.

Hi both. Also local. Good to see so much activity.

Hi. Thanks for a changeset comment that says what it does. I'd probably count the path from Darland Farm up to Star Lodge as within the Darland Banks boundary - but whether within the wood is another question. It's on OS 1st edition as a road...

It's not a 'feature' and it's not a service road. Whatever gave you that idea? It's a High Street, Roman road etc. Them previous classification of highway=pedestrian is far closer. Are you a an armchair mapper? On the ground wins ALWAYS in OSM.

Hi SupersonicTC and welcome. I've made the houses rectangles and where I could, I've 'terraced' them so individual houses are separate (with shared corners/nodes). The UK chapter of OSM runs quarterly projects, and a recent one has been addresses. Link to OSM wiki osm.wiki/UK_Quarterly_Project. I've added some addresses in Parkwood shopping centre (e.g. Parkwood Cafe) as part of an earlier project mapping places with Food Hygiene records, so these should be visible in iD. Good luck and welcome.

Thanks Trigpoint

As you were previously asked, the same applies.
Welcome to OSM.
Have you added a park that doesn't really exist to try to attract Pokémon? The 'park' seem to over the top of people's gardens, or am I wrong?
Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work.

I'll take a look next time I'm over that way. Edge of defence related land could easily have a footpath inside the fence, and users could easily tag that as foot=yes without realising that implies public access.

The wiki has access=no as a valid tag. Removing access=no needs survey evidence that access is permitted (It's BAe land).

Forge Lane end https://www.flickr.com/photos/13667243@N06/25603240284/in/datetaken/

Close-up of sign https://www.flickr.com/photos/13667243@N06/25935120310/in/datetaken/

Thanks. Unfortunately I hadn't mapillary'd it. I've got the forge lane entrance but not the rest. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/JJYQuKwPX4LD8E7bEktnGQ/photo. Armchair mappers welcome to use the mapillary pics.

Think the Bredhurst one may be way/37282705 which on the out of copyright 1:25000 OS is the continuation of Chapel Lane. The changeset one does not enter Bredhurst parish. It's definitely not a through road, with notices at the Forge Lane end

Why is Chapel Lane Unclassified? It's closed at both ends (gate at Forge Lane end, bollards at the Hempstead end and functions as a bridleway. Not open to through traffic except pedestrian, bicycle and horse.

Survey expedition on Mapillary http://www.mapillary.com/map/s/m7q1KaQD6ZvdsHZPaO-5yQ and http://www.mapillary.com/map/s/OVEK_jSOwNFaySOeCs5slg

Thanks Robert