The thing is that I think you should revert my reverts in the order, and then revert the changesets even if they say "Reverted". I don't have time right now, i'm preparing for my exams in university.

to be honest, I am the only one who worked on this area, so nobody else touched it in the last 10 days.

I think the problem is i didn't go from the last to the first, and this may cause the huge mistake, thus i cannot revert this, I think.

Reverted.

Reverted.

Please revert this. Don't question me, i got a DWG warning, just i exceeded my quota of Overpass turbo

Reverted.

Reverted.

This changeset is due to revert, just JOSM reverter doesn't do anything.

changeset/104726989
the JOSM reverter doesn't work correctly for the changeset in this particular case, so i couldn't revert that particular one. If you can, please do that, i don't want to overwrite anything.

"wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone. " Actually that was back in October 2020

Yes, I know about the issue, i might revert the thing, because actually there are 3-4 changesets affected by this. The WV GIS TC told something to wolfgang8741 that "everything can be used of WV GIS Clearinghouse to OSM (public domain), unless explicitly stated". The problem is, that on WV GIS TC there is a declaration "imagery web service is for view only", but why don't they just grant permission? It is weird, because the Clearinghouse has the purpose to reuse something. Actually, this question is on rise on OSMUS Slack, but we haven't gotten any reply back from wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone.
The problem is, that they didn't explicitly stated the stuff.

Because you warned me (also DUGA warned me), i think i have to revert the stuff which contains the "WV GIS TC Imagery" like this changeset, and if any of the WVU members grant permission only for OSM mappers to trace their imagery, then the stuff i could not trace from NAIP/Maxar/Bing/Esri will be corrected.

I hope this clarification is good.

Well, i asked it in Discord and i got it that the cut-off areas should be mapped as scrub

Some areas have cut logs, but those don't belong into the forest anymore, unless it's going to be readded. For more questions, feel free to ask, since i'm an experienced mapper. :)
I'm available on slack.openstreetmap.us.

When you try to add forest please try to map along the forest outline so where there is no trees, don't make it into a forest. (relation/12718765 see this for example or this: relation/12702006)
I hope you'll keep onto this guidelines. :)

And also i aligned a lot of stuff.

Á, így már világos.

De szerintem ebből nem fogsz több ilyet találni mert azóta én is rendberaktam a környéket eléggé, amikor házszámoztam teljesen a környékem

Hmm. Amikor én címkézgettem fel a dolgokat általában nem sablonból csináltam hanem mindig felvittem hogy leisure=swimming_pool, és ennyi. de tényleg nem tudom miért nem vettem le róla, általában, ami szögletes dolog, azt a buildings_tools-szal lerajzoltam, csak van, hogy elfelejtettem levenni róla a building=yes-t. ennyi. :D

amúgy a buildings toolst használtam amikor csináltam a környéket és auto felrakja a building=yes címkét mindenre.