nevw's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123233946 | Hi
|
|
| 123032865 | Hi
|
|
| 122983212 | I deleted both tags |
|
| 122983212 | Hi
|
|
| 122629050 | Fixed by simplifying |
|
| 122740970 | Hi
|
|
| 122740970 | Hi
|
|
| 122629050 | Hi
|
|
| 42582699 | I have reverted this changeset. |
|
| 122420559 | I reverted this edit as I expected this remains a secondary college. |
|
| 122307689 | Hi
|
|
| 122268225 | Hi
|
|
| 122267992 | Hi
|
|
| 122313284 | Hi
|
|
| 122098571 | The building tag is meant for depicting the building outline and not the block of land. |
|
| 122092086 | This appears incorrectly mapped and bears no relationship to bounds of natural areas viewed on satellite imagery. |
|
| 122048108 | You would add the tag to the outline way of the house instead of a node as the building outline is already mapped. |
|
| 122048108 | Hi
|
|
| 121690794 | If you would like to discuss this further with the Australian OSM community, a good place to do this would be via the talk.au mailing list
|
|
| 121690794 | I have not seen the the amenity=letterbox method before but it seems more suited to a group of letterboxes out the front of an area that services unit complexes. This is an example of the usual residential house address where the outline of the house is mapped and the address tags are added to that ...
Examples of these methods can be seen nearby...
|