Thanks, I updated the wooded areas a bit.

Though if these houses are the usual house letter boxes served by the postal service, the addr scheme may be more suitable.

apologies, your tagging is correct...I was completely unaware of this tagging scheme...
amenity=letter_box

You appear to have taken a guess at how the tagging scheme works in the OSM.
Please refer to the wiki guidance...
osm.wiki/Addresses

Hi
have you had a go at fixing this problem yet? If not, I will in the next couple of days.

Hi
have you had a go at fixing this problem yet? If not, I will in the next couple of days.

:)

Here is useful info on multipolygons
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Hi
There is a problem with this multipolygon relation
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95289&lat=-26.71289&zoom=16
Mutipolygons are much better handled using Josm

This changeset did not need reverting as I fixed Eudlo Creek National Park when reverting Changeset: 121339139.
Because the multipolygon relation for the NP is restored I removed the name from the wooded area you mapped.
This part of the map seems fine now.
Tks

no response, reverted this changeset, before too much else gets mapped, to restore Eudlo Creek National Park and wooded area in vicinity.

I can easily fix these two changesets I have commented on. Just need confirmation that you have seen my messages and are ok that I fix them.
Tks

Hi
You seem to have added three inner parts to the Greenbank Army Range relation
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95375&lat=-27.64026&zoom=14
Not sure what you meant to do but these would seem to be to be part of the range and should not be added as inners to the relation.
Did you instead want to add the inners as holes to the wooded area instead?

This changeset also needs reverting to correct the NP boundary.

note also that the tagging of the relation is generally how we have been tagging these areas.

As stated in the previous changeset/121339139, this is not the correct boundary for the NP.
You appear to be basing the boundary on the treed area using satellite imagery.
We have explicit permission to use the official gazetted boundaries for natural protected areas which are the Protected areas of Qld as listed here
osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Queensland and the Aust wide CAPAD as listed here
osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Australia-wide
Treed areas are normally mapped separately to the boundaries of the protected areas using satellite imagery.

Hi
I just fixed the Eudlo Creek National Park yesterday to reinstate the Govt gazetted boundary by using the Protected areas of Queensland - boundaries - 2020.
relation/8281067
In addition to the correct boundary of the NP, I also mapped the wooded areas in it's vicinity.
Your changeset needs to be reverted here to correct the area.

Hi
I expect the correct spelling is Fourth Groyne

Hi
we don't have permission to use the Corelogic data at propertyvalue.com.au on OSM as it is copyright.
Only use open data sources or with explicit permission.
osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources

Phone syntax corrected