nevw's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 112925127 | Hi
|
|
| 112925127 | Hi
|
|
| 112930385 | Hi
|
|
| 112913231 | Hi
|
|
| 112863216 | more specifically...
|
|
| 112863216 | Hi
|
|
| 112526586 | Hi
|
|
| 112316486 | no response, reverted until I hear back from the mapper and/or the Gold Coast City Council regarding this. Will remap as a multipolygon separately from existing wooded areas if more info is forthcoming. |
|
| 112399518 | no response, retagged individual trees from natural=wood to natural=tree, deleted names |
|
| 112588577 | no response, reverted as unable to resolve where office or business premise is and maybe only online business listing. |
|
| 112863216 | Yes, waypoints are not normally mapped as you can see the junctions along the path on the map. Normally waypoints are added as needed to any gps traces that we might load on to a gps device. |
|
| 112863216 | Hi
|
|
| 112201627 | I feel this is a very significant boundary too and would like to see it remain in OSM, though there does not appear to be protect_class that it readily fits into, perhaps use protect_class=7.
|
|
| 112526586 | You need to correct the tagging or it will be reverted. |
|
| 112600141 | no response, shifted to probable location, deleted malformed tags, reformatted others. |
|
| 112600141 | Hi
|
|
| 112588577 | Hi
|
|
| 112526064 | ||
| 112526064 | Hi
|
|
| 112526586 | I think natural=tree is the tag used for individual trees
|