I guess only the shapefile ones are of interest.

Warin
Here is a list of changesets with MapshareVic in the changeset comment, if it helps.
https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22comment%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22MapshareVic%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22MapshareVic%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%222021-06-01%22%2C%22value%22%3A%222021-06-01%22%7D%5D%2C%22in_bbox%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22113.6774%2C-44.1632%2C152.5116%2C-10.4318%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22113.6774%2C-44.1632%2C152.5116%2C-10.4318%22%7D%5D%7D

Ooops... https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=112406297

Hi
this has been deleted now by using JOSM reverter. Thanks for letting us know.

Hi
I will delete it Tomorrow. I expect that you would be unable to do this from the OsmAnd editor.

?
Are you asking someone else to delete this or is this a note to yourself?
I am unfamiliar with the editor you are using but can delete this edit if that is what you are requesting.

Hi
do these trees actually have names?
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Hi
you have used the mapped wooded areas to define the proposed Coomera City Centre.
The wooded areas currently exist and should remained mapped in osm.

It would be better to leave the wooded boundaries as they were and create a new boundary for the proposed Coomera City Centre or to use re-use the wooded boundaries segments to create a multipolygon of the proposed Coomera City Centre.

It seems to me that the proposed Coomera City Centre is mapped approximately by re-using the wooded boundaries or do the individual wooded areas reflect different stages of the proposed development.
Is there a source that can be used in the OSM to more accurately define the proposed Coomera City Centre.

A point of the proposed Coomera City Centre boundary joins the rail line and needs to be disconnected.

Does the current Bing imagery reasonably define the current state of the wooded areas?

Thanks for fixing.

Hi
From this view of your changeset
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112236974
you can see that one corner of the retail area in the north is joined to the overhead powerline. Let me know if you are unable to correct it.
Tks

There are may tools to monitor your area of interest, including my own edits, listed here
osm.wiki/Quality_assurance
I often use osm.wiki/Achavi
and https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/

Hi
you may have missed tagging a middle section of the Mount Urialla Trail
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112098512

Hi Freddie
I have reverted the accidental deletion of part of Redwoord St and the public transport route relations.

Hi KenS
I reverted this changeset so I could restore some route relations from a previous changeset. The routes and roads are now restored to their previous positions so should be all fixed now.

no response from mapper and have now deleted the names from the houses.

no response from mapper so removed bridge from Karuk Trail. From satellite imagery there appears to be no bridge.

Hi
please don't add the name=* to the houses. You have already added addr:housenumber and addr:street to OSM.
Names are only added to things that have names such as a street name.
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

You seem to have also displaced the Redwood Street bus stop over your houses.
There are about 10 bus routes affected.
I will reverted this changeset I think and then try to add back your houses if Idon’t hear from you in a day.

I have corrected the building shape to suit the tagging. You may prefer to also add the fence lines of the property.

Hi
did you mean to add a bridge to the entire Karuk Trail or did you intend to split the trail at the creek crossing and map a smaller bridge over the creek?