OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
177500062

Hi, your changeset only contains deleted items. Are all these items no longer present? or is there a another reason for the deletions.

177335313

correction: Why did you add New Zealand details to this reserve in Victoria?…..reverted.

177335313

Why did you are New Zealand details to this reserve in Victoria?…..reverted.

177283165

I reverted this changeset because it is easier for you to add the business details again yourself being careful not to accidentally dragged other map nodes

177314389

Hi, I have reverted the living street with the name of "sun flats road" you added over top of existing tracks.
Can you further explain what you are trying to add so that we can help you do it properly.

177312948

Hi, I partially reverted this changeset which changed a section of the Tasman Highway south of Beaumaris to a path. This area seems fixed now.

177283165

Hi, you have accidentally dragged some nodes to incorrect positions.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177283165
In the top right a tree has been dragged to a building and at the bottom more obvious shifts.
When using iD you need to zoom in closely and be careful not to shift nodes accidentally. iD does have an undo button to use while editing and it’s needed often.
If you are unable to fix, comment here and I’ll fix tomorrow.

177201980

I have reverted this changeset which add a wetland tag to Darwin city poi and added a wetland point to a remote area

167498790

Hi, you need to fix these invalid multipolygon relation in two separate areas.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=129.89639&lat=-0.46185&zoom=16
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=130.25552&lat=-0.39362&zoom=16

177121325

Hi, you can choose Esri imagery instead of Bing which displays the buildings

176884978

I have fixed the wooded multipolygon area now

176913284

Hi, looks like there are a few mapping errors to do with how you construct multipolygons to fix here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=131.69062&lat=-1.45391&zoom=14
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

176965580

I have reverted this changeset and will leave to the mapper to remap the business to a more suitable location

176965580

Hi, you have placed a business name on a roadway centreline. Please place the business at the building site you operate from and preferably with more details.

176961471

Hi, you have added your digital marketing company to a power substation in Berwick. Your website says your office is located in
Cranbourne North. You should locate this at the office you operate from.

176939353

Hi, we map houses by zooming in and precisely drawing the outline of the house itself instead of the plot of land it sits on.
If you wish to display the plot shape then map the fence lines accurately is a good alternative.

176884978

Hi, this appears to be missing it’s outer
relation/20052530#map=18/-27.550730/153.158080

176845447

Hi, the multipolygons is invalid as outer ways cannot share a side.
Can you use simple polygons instead or use a one simple polygon encompassing the lot.

176842751

Hi, are you going to monitor this situation and update the map as soon as the tree is cleared?

176659103

I think it is ok now. I made the big sand hill a multipolygon. The wood is a mp but not including the small segment of sand along the beach. Patches of wood in the big sand hill are outers for the wood mp and inners for the big sand hill mp.
I took the tag natural=wood off the patches of trees in the sand hill because they are tagged as wood in the wood relation.
There is another area of sand joining the big sand hill but probably not considered part of the big sand hill so I made that a multipolygon so I could use the shared segment in both.
Hope this helps.
If you get deeply into micro-mapping complex natural areas you may need to use simple polygons with overlapping sides as mp may not be able to be resolved.