OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
135175267

Hi, shop=outpost seems an odd choice to me for an it company. Is this correct?

135131424

Hi, I think you accidentally shifted an address node near the bottom of this display - #30A Unwin Road
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135131424

134842153

Hi, why have you deleted the religion = christian tag from the Mormon church.
Mormons consider themselves christian and the tag should remain. If you disagree with the icon used you will need to take that up with the map rendering software instead.

134519719

Excuse my ignorance - what is IG?

133970296

No response, removed roadway apartment

134140404

Reshaped using faint lines that appear to be a fence and name also renders at some zoom levels

133910774

As the Geofabrik osm inspector sees it
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.46558&lat=-16.48903&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

133910774

Outer ways of multipolygons cannot share the same boundary….just draw the courts as three simple rectangles instead and delete the unnecessary multipolygon.
You could draw another polygon around the boundary of the tennis club if you want to name the whole club area.
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon/validity

134140404

The name of this cemetery does not render. I asked on Carto github https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4795
Not sure if it can be improved but tagging and geometry is fine to me. I might adjust the boundary of the cemetery closer to the roadway entrance later and this may affect the label.

134140404

I went ahead and added the cemetery as outer in the relation and Bora Ring as inner. I also added fence lines I could see. I also shifted the Tucki Tucki location marker a bit further away from the bora ring for clarity. Looks fine I think.

134140404

I haven't deleted the relation yet as you may prefer to add the add the cemetery border as an outer.

134140404

I deleted the relation with only an inner member as it is an invalid geometry for OSM.
If you feel the Bora Ring is not part of the cemetery then you would need a relation with the cemetery with the role of outer and the Bora Ring with the role as inner.
The bounds of the cemetery were previously drawn following the surrounding fence lines. Was this incorrect? The DCS various layers are not of much help but the base layer maybe the best of them.

133970296

Hi, you have mapped Axe on the roadway. Should it be over a building instead?

133897603

fixed now.

133897603

I have changed the name on the public transport bus stops in this changeset.
changeset/133964811
but there remains this stop and relation to fix but am unable to confirm the new stop name...
node/644682645#map=17/-35.19647/149.10796

133897603

Thanks TheSwavu

133897603

The osm needs to have the current name so I will go ahead and revert your edits to reflect the real name. Please take your cause to the ACT government to effect the change you desire. The osm is an operational map and it’s function relies on us mapping the current real world state.

133897603

Thanks for the prompt reply. In view of the name change, are you happy for me to revert your changes to reflect the current name?

133897603

The name change from William Slim Drive was delayed but should be complete by now
See this news article from 2022…
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/101092100

133897603

Hi,
the name William Slim Drive was changed some time ago I think.
https://www.planning.act.gov.au/survey-spatial-data-and-maps/boundary-surveying/roads-addressing-and-place-names/place-names/act-place-names-committee-and-guidelines-review

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/11185016