It's been nine months, you should be able to delete this "test data" now

Look at the node linked above--that one and others near it have a building tag, but are nowhere near a building. Maybe using the centroid worked within a town, but not in rural area? Other points don't even have an address--why were those even imported? It'd be nice if you could clean up the data.

Hi and welcome to OSM! Noticed your edit in the area and wanted to point out a couple things: 1) buildings should be traced to represent their outline, it doesn't look like this is a round house :) 2) it's not common to label who lives at a particular house. not to say you can't do it, but remember this is open data and may end up displaying in places you don't expect...

another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key

there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few)

Just an FYI, the Nachusa boundary was not closed properly, I think I've fixed it and the tagging. Please verify :) way/333487229

I didn't follow the whole way, but at least parts of these lines don't appear to meet the standard on the wiki for "abandoned"--they're more like razed (osm.wiki/Railways#Life-cycle) Can you please review and retag as appropriate?

I noticed that you "creatively" named some alleys in this changeset. OpenStreetMap is not a "sandbox" environment, so all changes affect the data for everyone. Please correct these edits, provide sources for the names, or your whole changeset may be reverted. Thanks

hi, it's unclear to me what you're adding with this (and a couple other similar nodes). is it a mile marker? if so, it should be tagged highway=milestone. if not, I'm not sure if it's good data to add to OSM from what I can tell: 1) it doesn't seem to be an observable feature, 2) it could be derived from the data, and 3) I don't know what a use case would be for it

Why did you change Aldens Corners to an isolated dwelling (wiki: "Smallest kind of human settlement. No more than 2 households.")? it clearly has more than two residences. Looks like you've done the same with other places tagged hamlet too.

From spot checking, it looks like you tagged many of these roads' maxspeed twice

Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See way/322503620, way/322114569, way/322114772, way/322503687

welcome to OSM! just a quick tip: don't include =* in the key tag. when something like highway=* is mentioned in the wiki where it's talking about key=value combinations, it means the key is highway and the value can be anything. if you look at the tags for the Edgewood Place way, you should get the idea. cheers!

Hi, I see you created a way (way/323261135) for the 46 bus route (relation/4502291). This is NOT how to do bus routes. You should add the existing road ways to the route relation, not create a new, overlapping way. See these examples of the 84 (relation/3840819) or the 21 (relation/3859430) routes. Also please see the wiki for instructions on how to do route relations: osm.wiki/Relation:route#How_to_map

Hi, noticed this change when it was flagged in OSM Inspector. You appear to have created a new relation for the Helena National Forest (relation/4470349) and broken the old relation (relation/4436658)? In addition, the way you added with this changeset includes only the source data attributes (no OSM tagging at all) which doesn't appear to conform to the import guidelines osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines. Please try to harmonize the data with OSM.

Hi Peter, not sure why you created a node just with your name on it. If it is the location of your office, you should tag it as such, for example see this page for ideas: office=*

Hi, I see some errors with this changeset in the Vicksburg, Mississippi area. You duplicated data and misused basic tags. For example, see way/322114814 and the nearby Culkin Road bridge. Please correct ASAP.

hey just wondering why you're adding nodes only tagged with josm/ignore on them? if it's notes for yourself, maybe there are better ways to do it?

fyi, I removed the hospital tag from the ARC building--it is not a hospital

these parking areas don't make a lot of sense. try tracing them more accurately as they actually are, including tracing around buildings. tagging capacity is a nice touch, though!