Confused as to what is under construction in the NW corner of this changeset. If it's the roads, then the roads should be tagged with construction. If it's housing, then I would expect a larger area.

It's not too bad, if you want to give it a go: when a "normal" (two-way) road like this has a bike lane on each side, you can just add cycleway=lane to the road way. You'd only create a separate highway=cycleway way if it is truly separated from the road.

Welcome to OSM! Wondering, is there a bike lane here? I don't see it on Hennepin Cty maps. If so, it should be tagged on the road way (see osm.wiki/Bicycle)

regarding the West Lima way, if you're trying to show the legal boundary, use boundary=administrative. if you're trying to show landuse, most of the city appears to be landuse=residential. there's more info on these tags as well as place tags on the OSM wiki: osm.wiki

you're doing some very detailed mapping here, but I'm curious why some of it is mapped the way it is. for example, way/353841066 seems like it should be a multipolygon relation (with an outer and inner part). and there are lots of adjacent identical landuses, with no clear reason why they are separated (for example, see ways 353839774 and 353839776)

yes, I see now that wheelmap has a very limited set of options for features

I had heard of wheelmap but hadn't looked closely until now. It seems odd that some buildings show up there and others don't. Pretty much all things that "look" like buildings on the map at wheelmap.org are buildings in OSM. You can add the same info directly via OSM.org, but it's not quite as easy :(

Hi, this info on wheelchair accessibility is really useful, but if there is an existing building drawn, can you add it to that building's way instead of creating a new point? I did so on Coffman, but left Kolthoff and Smith if you want to do those. Thanks!

Hi, I think you mistagged the MN Kali Group as a bank. Should probably be amenity=dojo. Thanks for mapping!

wondering why you made this a coastline?? that tag is reserved for ocean coasts only (the great lakes are a notable exception) because it's much harder to deal with both in editing and rendering

Hey lizzzzz, fyi, I'm changing the LifeTime to leisure=fitness_centre, per discussion on osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre. Let me know if Qs

Hi, noticed that you appear relatively new, and just wanted to point out a couple things that are non-standard about this edit: 1) a way for a restaurant will usually be the building only and not include the parking area, 2) generally if you make a way for a restaurant, and there's also a node, you should remove the node so that there is only one object in OSM per feature. Hope this helps and happy mapping!

I'm guessing this wasn't really based on the Nepal imagery? :) (see changeset source)

fyi, the fitness stations should be leisure=fitness_station, not amenity=fitness_station

a better way to handle a vacant building is the disused tag, for example disused:office=yes (see disused=*:)

Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??

Some of the wikipedia links are bad on the Chipotles. Not to mention, giving every individual restaurant its own link to the Chipotle wikipedia page seems like overkill???

Sorry, had never seen a tag like old_leisure. I added that tag back

Hi Tomarr, I'm noticing that in the southern area of this changeset at least, you added duplicate data (for example, buildings around buildings). In addition, all the corners of the buildings are also tagged building=yes. I've fixed (removed) some, but you might take a look, as well as try and avoid this issue in the future. Cheers!

You added this node with some unusual tags, so it's unclear what is meant by them. I'd recommend you change as mentioned below. 1) You seem to imply that the area is not currently known as Harris Creek. If this is true, you could probably tag with old_name instead of name. 2) Active is not a documented key, it's not clear what it means in this context, and it's rarely used--probably best to delete. 3) Places are not usually tagged historic, and historic=yes is "best avoided" according to the wiki, so you might want to delete that too. 4) If you don't know the population, just remove that tag.