It's not strictly a motorway services -- you can access it from the A-roads -- there's even a footpath that looks like it should connect to the services in the north-east.

Can't see any no pedestrian signs on Mapillary -- looks reasonable for horse riders too.

I'm partially reverting this - the building isn't triangular and road probably doesn't connect directly to the building.

Some of edits seem to be mixing up legal rights, i.e. access - with whether a footpath or a sidewalk is present - which is obviously different :-)

Perhaps you could double check that there’s signage explicitly disallowing pedestrians.

Also access is public until the gate

Why are you marking private roads as access = no

Well it would be best if you could do a proper survey as I mentioned above.

As for tone - it’s always difficult to get right - I doubt neither of us are perfect.

I'm sure after five years it'll benefit from a good on the ground survey.

Feel free to add more information. I suspect I was on an organised ramble and obviously found the company of my fellow walkers more interesting than an obscure service road's access rights. I do tend to add the pubs though.

This is miles from Avonmouth, seems an unlikely misleading name.

Is this really being constructed now?

If you edit roads in the City and County of Bristol and change postal_code then you need to move the signed value to an appropriate tag (signed:postal_code). Or just use addr:postcode if you really want to have the whole postcode somehow associated with the road. Otherwise there will be a loss of surveyed information and the changeset will likely get reverted.

Roads (ways) don't really have full postcodes - buildings on opposite sides can often have different full postcodes.

I'll revert.

You are changing items that are carefully surveyed - the road signs in Bristol have postcodes on them - that’s what the postal code on the road is signifying - it should be what is signed, I.e. BS9.

It looks like you've redrawn the recycling centre from the old Bing imagery -- this is before it was refurbished. The previous mapped data you deleted matches the GPX tracks I've surveyed for the new facility with up/down ramps and extra specific recycling area "in the middle", e.g. for rubble, batteries, etc.

I'll try and upload tracks too.

Not sure that the "sidewalk=separate" is really true - sure you've drawn it as a separate way - but in reality there's nothing between the sidewalk and the road. You can cross anywhere. More detail's great but in this case it's likely to confuse pedestrian routers?

No worries - just spotted the no-entry except bikes on Mapillary.

Is this a recent change -- it's clearly two-way on Bing streetside https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=35581164-8d7e-4d7f-ac8c-c96a3fe92561&cp=51.46837~-2.613307&lvl=19&dir=44.859768&pi=-1.4095678&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Ok, so this is correct -- no like the other times mapbox have editted this street.

This needs to be reverted - it's correct as is.