Looks like a ferry route got dragged north-east -- some strange artifacts on riverbanks near ferry terminals.

Bristol Power Signal Box (and its chimney) used to match ESRI Clarity - not sure what it's matching now? Maybe stuff got dragged -- there's a wobble in the parking lane near Bristol Power Signal Box. GPS data isn't conclusive -- matched old version as well (if not better) than the new one?

Can't see any no U-turn signs on Bing -- are you sure it's there?

Moved to OSM message.

Ok, it seems that you don't have a good idea of the licence or copyright of the data you are adding - and whether it's compatible with odbl, i.e. the openstreetmap licence. I wouldn't add any more until you can clarify things - it's probably something you should check.

It's still an import even if done "by hand".

Do you have the copyright information for the source you are using?

Hi. Can you please explain the basis/source of your updates -- if this is an import you need to follow the import guidelines, otherwise your changes will likely be reverted.

Copyrighted address info is at https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/BPW/details.aspx

I think you need to report a bug and stop using the app until it's fixed then -- it should have added "nohousenumber=yes"

Not sure why noaddress is required -- National Rail seem to think it has an address?

Tweaked service road to use ESRI clarity.

Tweaked this to use ESRI clarity as in the Bristol wiki entry.

This looks a bit odd - tempted to revert this.

The coach station tags are now duplicated onto a new POI (should only be a single item) -- and the coach station building is now removed from the coach station relation?

The existing content on the map, i.e. building is drawn from ESRI clarity. You haven't realigned the Maxar imagery to match the existing content -- I'll fix that now.

This area is under active development -- there's a new building "The Cigar Factory" there now -- may not be visible on imagery.

You are correct that there is a no-entry sign on St Augustine's Parade forbidding entry -- this was already implemented as a very small section of oneway=yes.

However, there are no oneway signs on Denmark Street itself -- it is (theoretically) possible to turn and drive back in the opposite directtion on the section you marked as oneway.

Your oneway was correct when I surveyed it -- I also removed the oneway:bicycle=no near Royal Fort Road that you had left.

According to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-August/023358.html it seems that you need to either remove edits or add an attribution notice.

Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)

Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)