Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)

Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)

Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)

Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)

Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)

Reverted - service roads don't go through walls. Plus this area is being redeveloped and is subject to change

Realigned with ESRI - fixed up non-square buildings (probably due to pointy roofs and strange Maxar parallax) added missing building, created multipolygon

Adjusted roads, redrew buildings - realigned and separated them -- needs a survey

Realigned to move buildings off of roads!

Realigned buildings to ESRI clarity so that they don't overlap the roads.

I tried to keep the new tags you added -- so hopefully, just a glitch

I'm going to revert this -- you've removed the building tag and all the address information.

I've tried to adjust this so landuses don't overlap -- does "Kings Weston Ln" have a better name?

I'm going to revert most of this -- you've moved separate buildings on top of each other -- and put a whole landuse layer on top of an existing one.

If you insist on use a beta imagery layer you need to adjust it to match existing content -- not just move stuff randomly.

Why are you adding oneway=yes -- there are no oneway markings -- please check Bing Streetside.

Why are you adding oneway=yes -- there are no oneway markings -- please check Bing Streetside.

You've removed the oneway sections that are clearly visible on mapbox and maxar imagery.

Please stop if you're still importing footpaths piecemeal -- it's still an import!

There is no GPX data for the paths you are adding -- it doesn't seem that they've ever been surveyed. I think you need to survey them and provide GPX data. If not I'll revert all the imports including this one.

Well it's really simple if you survey it yourself and don't copy.

Assuming all the licencing is fine (!) then maybe any new "paths" need a source=rowmaps and fixme=survey (unless you've walked them).