Ok, my bad -- didn't think about cascade steps -- might need highway=step too then?

Not sure this is right - are you using old satellite imagery? One fountain section has been closed / covered in "decking" and is now a food market. I was there today!

Difficult to judge by eye -- but https://binged.it/2tP8vmI seems to show the N//S section bollard closer to Baldwin Street?

This is wrong - are you using old satellite imagery? One fountain section has been closed and is now a food market. Was there today!

This was well-aligned using ESRI clarity - I'll revert

The turn restriction isn't needed - the road's already oneway.

Note: this area is likely to change a lot in the near future: https://www.deeleyfreed.co.uk/cribbs-urban-village-bristol and http://www.studio-hive.co.uk/?projects=cribbs-urban-village

Nice :-)

No worries - I just wanted to make sure before I marked it as a building passage -- I couldn't be sure just looking at imagery.

Missed the landuse construction - and I use ESRI clarity. I've modified buildings and added service roads.

Because there is now an old footpath running through the buildings I have added a note to ask local mappers to survey on the ground. And it will remind me too when I'm in the neighbourhood.

Please add a changeset comment - it's difficult to click on a "."

I've removed the parking aisle going through the building.

way/672292392

Are you sure the parking aisle goes through the building? GPS track?

Maybe a difference between UK legal version of a private road, versus OSM access=private.

Surprised you don't mark them as access=delivery :-)

I think the outpatients at least is being demolished / reconstructed - maybe also the Cotswold ward too - I would maybe wait a while before editting there.

Thanks for the extra review.

As I said ask talk-GB -- but removing the signed (suspended) onewayness isn't a great idea. The road will likely just get joined back without adding the oneway back as the normal state is lost.

Maybe: use the temporary: prefix then -- temporary:oneway=no, temporary:access=destination

Or if the end date for construction is known make the oneway happen after that date.

As I said ask talk-GB -- but removing the signed (suspended) onewayness isn't a great idea. The road will likely just get joined back without adding the oneway back as the normal state is lost.

Maybe: use the temporary: prefix then -- temporary:oneway=no, temporary:access=destination

Or if the end date for construction is known make the oneway happen after that date.

Well I wasn't happy to see the one-way restriction removed.

Maybe talk-GB can suggest a better approach.

I've rejigged this and just marked roads affected by construction as "highway=construction" and moved the previous highway type to xxx "construction=xxx".

I just don't want to lose info like oneway, etc. when construction is over.