Paving is different for the service road than the rest of the pavement -- it can clearly be used to get cars in/out -- even if only in an emergency.

Please revert, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/27389948628/in/dateposted-public/

You don't need to name every house "house".

The school doesn't need naming -- it's already inside an "amenity=school" with the correct name -- as indicated on the wiki page.

https://www.yha.org.uk/ has "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)". Like OpenStreetmap has "© OpenStreetMap contributors". If you believe the second is important -- then so is the first.

Anyway, If there's agreement on the mailing list then there's less likelihood of changes being reverted.

Already mapped

Still has Network Rail signage on it :-) https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/27230255338/in/dateposted-public/

I suggest you discuss it on the talk-gb mailing list before making further YHA-related edits.

OpenStreetmap is about what is actually present -- you shouldn't change names that are from on-the-ground surveys.

Plus, you would have to have a licence from YHA to use their copyrighted material on OpenStreetmap.

I checked both ends -- you're right signage is only at one end.

I will probably use "bicycle=dismount" -- no idea how Strava copes with that -- but feel free to log a bug with them if it's problematic.

Can't use Google Streetview as it's not allowed as a source for OSM -- but an on-foot survey near the BSW 68028 railway bridge got the following photo - note the small blueish sign with white writing in the background https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/40066732525/in/dateposted-public/

Will update the path to reflect the dismount sign.

shelter=no

Try https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ if you just want to draw a route on an existing map.

Ok, you're right there are 11 front units, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/39424835715/in/dateposted-public/

Looking a bit closer I think that the front of yours is probably correct, but units are too large and back extends too far (back of mine is correct). Also first and last units are only half depth.

Will revert and tweak as required later -- have a few other surveys to get mapped first.

Anyway rest of the realignment was a distinct improvement -- glad you deleted all the construction lines :-)

Well, I was a bit disappointed too -- as I counted all the units very carefully on the ground.

Anyway, I'm going past today -- so will have a look at how many units each shop really has -- I'll stick a couple of photos on flickr / mapilliary so we can all see.

Have used latest Bing imagery for positioning -- should be in the correct position.

I had a look and I think it needs modifying:

1). remove access=no
2). Add short one-way segments to match two no-entry signs.

Basicallty it becomes a glorified bike lane - which is ok if you enter at the middle / at the crossing.

Your layout better matches what is on the ground now.

The 20mph limit is signed at the opposite end of the Highwood Road bus lane.

My recollection from walking it several times was that it was square at the housing estate end -- but I could be wrong -- the mapillary GPS loop of images looks pretty square. Needs surveying anyway to check any extra new/finished construction in the estate.

Not convinced by this -- I've seen cyclists on the link to the South A38 in the last week -- will resurvey.