OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
56239962

Not sure about the Great Brier Leaze mods, will resurvey.

56149920

Grotto was already mapped - not really a building

56119737

You've removed one perfectly reasonable name with what appears to be a vague description -- which is a shame -- especially as satnav's won't take the name into account when routing. I've added a note so that local mappers will hopefully come up with a solution that matches signage "on the ground".

55813974

nore -> node :-)

55813974

YMMV -- I think this should work:

Highlight the node to copy and Ctrl+C, move to new position and Crtl+V. Then delete wrong tags from first nore.

55813974

Hopefully, I've managed to add this back.
Is there a duplicate, or a copy/paste function in iD you could use to get the bus stop on a separate node next time.

55668034

Must admit I wondered about that originally -- but then https://techspark.co/bristol-based-yogscast-share-how-to-reach-7b-views-on-youtube/ -- so that's why it has "level=4". I'll let someone else do the whole multi-level mapping for the other levels :-)

If it's the building name, then surely it should be addr:housename.

55668034

Not sure why this is an improvement? It's handy to have yogscast mapped as they run meetups in Bristol. The housename's already mapped. If you want to map the other building levels then please do so without disturbing what's already there.

55658804

Did you survey this? The lane is clearly oneway on Bing -- it looks like an obvious ramp to the top of a multi-storey carpark. If you think it needs an on-the-ground survey, then just add a note to the map for local mappers, rather than removing tags.

55559309

Can't see why a war memorial and a building should be labelled "leisure=park" they are already inside it.

55225336

landuse=recreation_ground

Suggests leisure=recreation_ground should be removed?

55191504

I've partially reverted this -- if it's now a house, then there's no need to delete the whole building.

55054116

Confused where this is supposed to be -- it's not on a pitch/pavilion?

54993490

The whole point was to keep the name rendered -- if it still has external signage.

I note that disused=*: doesn't mention disused:name -- are you it's still searchable?

54994782

I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.

Can't remember if they've taken down the signs on this one.

54993490

I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.

54799786

Ok, I'll revert it this evening.

54761082

Changing values is ok -- even if it provokes a discussion :-)

It's definitely better than just deleting the "wrong" one and trying to add a new corrected version.

54799786

You've just deleted the copyshop and moved the "odd" yog towers inside the other building -- not sure how this has improved the correctness of the mapping.

54761584

Probably shop=bakery would be better? Or add extra amenity=cafe too -- and hope data consumers can cope :-)