Depends :-)

Could add amenity=cafe -- or just take rely on the precedence implicit in the name, i.e. "Beer + Coffee" rather than "Coffee + Beer".

Pizzarova is already present -- and separate :-)

Added in the Cargo2 extension when it was empty. Have surveyed on foot -- but currently in my backlog of stuff todo.

Modified so buildings aren't grown incorrectly by including the front walls.

It's probably a pain in all editors -- I generally delete "middle" walls and then combine remaining ones.

I'll stick a note on the main map as a reminder for later work.

The name on the outside of the shop should be the name in OSM.

Leaving stale data is probably not a great idea -- I'd tend to delete it -- but some people just add "old_" to the start of the tag names.

Should probably be a single building then?

L-shape was mosty based on "rooflines" -- it's a pain trying to sort out buildings there :-)

What did it say when you surveyed it?

Should other items such as phone no, twitter, etc. be removed -- or are they still current?

Or just add "access=private"?

Great that you added the extra Aztec West park -- where did you get the name from? Pretty sure there's no signage.

If there were pedestrian access it would have a sidewalk tag.

I'm pretty sure this change is wrong -- I mapped it pretty carefully from a photo-survey.

Great, but this is already mapped.

I've moved the restaurant back to Kongs -- to keep the postcode, address and FHRS reference accurate. But I've removed the "Burger Theory" name to avoid confusion -- it is already mapped on Saint Stephens Street.

I've corrected the bad drag of a point on Taylor Gardens.

Did you survey this?

Only Bing shows building as you've drawn them.

I surveyed and drew some of the ones you deleted only about 6 months ago.

It doesn't have "junction=roundabout" -- if a router wants to recommend a violent turn, then it probably needs fixing, But common sense should also prevail when using a results from routing s/ware.

I'll have a look at the signage in the future..

This is unnecessary "tagging for the router" - Strava need to fix their app. Other routers have no problems: osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.50505%2C-2.61403%3B51.50292%2C-2.61347#map=18/51.50398/-2.61405

I understand why you added the restrictions - but they should only be there if they are signed -- are you sure there's a sign there?

I've had a quick go at adding the building, etc. It might not be great, but hopefully close enough so you can fix it.