OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
44772219

Hi,
could you explain the tag "food_prone = yes"? You used it several times, but it is not used any where else.

Cheers, Jan

44762386

Hi,
could you check this node?
The tag 'pl:Sieruciowce =administrative' looks like a mistake.
node/31519348

Cheers, Jan

44777703

Hi,
this relation and several others have many tags that look like they don't belong to OSM. Could you check that?

ACRES 14489.62
EASE_OPEN Open
EASE_STATU Open to All Use
OBJECTID 8844
PROP_NAME NAVARINO WILDLIFE AREA
RE_INFO_UR http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/lands/WildlifeAreas/navarino.html
SHAPE Polygon
SHAPE_AREA 5.8637399703449E7
SHAPE_LEN 117688.84857
TRANS_TYPE 1

Cheers, Jan

44792530

Hi,
your source tags have ticks (') in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you fix this? Actually, there is no need to put these tags, the information is already in the source tag of the changeset itself.

Cheers, Jan

44742256

Hi,
the two tags
barrier:gate yes
barrier:gate:access no
are not used in any other place. Could you describe the barrier and who can get through in words?

Jan

44736307

Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the tagging:
node/4577832566

Cheers, Jan

44742197

Hi,
kannst du das Tagging nochmal überprüfen?
In einigen Keys (z.B. railway:signal:typ) schreibst du type ohne e (zusammen mindestens 16 Mal) und teilweise auch mit einem Großbuchstaben am Anfang.

Gruß, Jan

44740230

Hi,
could you check the tagging of this area? Keys must be in English and only keys described in the wiki should be used.

Cheers, Jan

44705418

Hi,
I don't really understand the tagging of these objects, could you explain?
barrier = block - Barriers should be part of a way, some of these are not.
building:colurs = concrete - there is no building tagged, and 'concrete' is not a colour
colour = concrete - 'concrete' is not a colour
height = 10 - 10 meter high sounds more like a tower than a barrier.

Cheers, Jan

44776458

Hi,
may I ask for the source of data of all these hotels? There are many issues with this data:

- most hotels I checked already exist in the OSM database
- you deleted some existing hotels
- the tagging of the new nodes is wrong. Tags like addr:tourism, addr:phone or addr:name do not exist.

44707001

If it's established tagging, it's fine with me. I didn't want to start a discussion about it. On the other hand, even a highway=motorway has different legal rights in different countries. So there might be a chance to find a common tagging in the future.

Cheers, Jan

44714786

Hi,
the parking place has two tags
customers = yes
pulic = no (note the spelling mistake)

Usually this is tagged as
access=customers.

Cheers, Jan

44707001

Hi,
I didn't notice the spelling mistake in the key (3x e in streeet) and then wasn't able to find any other use of this key.

Btw, such a road in Germany would be tagged as
bicycle_road = yes
motor_vehicle=yes
osm.wiki/File:Fahrradstrasse_IMGP8343_smial_wp.jpg

44707001

Hi,
this way uses some uncommon tags:
way/462120108
cyclestreet = yes
cycleway = cyclestreet

Did you mean
bicycle_road = yes ?

Jan

44685273

Hi, welcome to OSM!
I think you have a spelling mistake on this node, what does "slnow=Slide" mean?
node/4573490972

Jan

44691415

Hi,
did you check the license of this data? The website mentions a "Copyrightvermerk" is needed, OSM can't guarantee this.

Jan

44689307

Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like these on this hotel:

Estacionamiento = Al lado cabaña
Etiquetas = Los Lleuques, Pinto, Ñuble, Bío Bío, Chile
parrilla = SI
piscina = SI

This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags for hotels.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan

44597532

Hi Andrzej,
I wrote a small tool that uses Taginfo to search for new keys:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm

44659948

Hi,
could you check this building?
way/461677093
The tag "957 =753" looks strange.

Cheers, Jan

44666264

Hallo,

an diesem Tag stimmt etwas nicht, was möchtest du ausdrücken?
way/30773848
"acces:conditional none @ destination"

Gruß, Jan