mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 56614708 | Hi,
|
|
| 56767170 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 56608764 | Could you check this and the adjacent way? They have many foreign tags.
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 56697881 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 56666338 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 56656968 | Hi,
route_ref = 1;23;24;34;56;78;245;... Would you mind changing your tagging to this common form? Cheers, Jan |
|
| 56546278 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan recycling:Akkujen_keräys=yes
|
|
| 56294771 | Hi,
|
|
| 40484498 | Yes, you're right. I've deleted the nodes now:
|
|
| 56427425 | Hi,
There are several keys that don't look like they should appear in OSM:
Could you check that?
|
|
| 56318272 | Hi,
Jan |
|
| 36567978 | Hallo,
Die verwendeten Werte der Keys entsprechen leider auch nicht den im Wiki dokumentierten internationalen Werten. |
|
| 56378054 | Tagging the colour is fine. But spelling of the tag is wrong. Note the difference: "building_colour" and "building:colour" - '_' versus ':'. The nodes I refer to are part of ways - that's correct. But they should not have tags themselves. For example this one:
Please let me know if you need any help!
|
|
| 56376380 | Hi,
Thanks, Jan |
|
| 56378054 | Hi,
There are 1332 objects with the tag "building_colour". This should be "building:colour" Additionally, all the nodes are tagged e.g. as building, but these tags seem to belong to the ways only. |
|
| 56289700 | Hallo,
Gruß, Jan |
|
| 56309658 | Hi,
Thanks! |
|
| 56294771 | Well, this is bad advice by your teacher. The OSM database is not meant for such "private" information. Introducing new tags usually follows a defined process and discussion in the community. Please remember that this data now has been copied to thousands of databases world-wide and will end up in even more devices showing OSM data. |
|
| 56295543 | Hi,
Jan |
|
| 56351434 | Hi,
Jan |