OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
53884445

Hi,
here you added the tag "mdds:code", a week ago it was "MDDS_Code". Could you change to a common spelling of the key?
Btw, if this is kind of a reference number used by government, I'd consider "ref:mdds" as better.

Cheers, Jan

52310959

Hi PC10,
did you actually read and understand all the changeset comments and the user block message?
Your edits have been deleted because of their quality. Now you start over and re-import all of this again? Please stop it!

changeset/53884840

53630367

The orange sign says something additional about "ramp closed".

On the white sign I'm also not sure about the precise meaning - is it "hov: only in the afternoon" (hov not allowed in the morning) or "in the afternoon: hov only" (everybody allowed in the morning, but not in the afternoon)

53630367

I can't read the orange sign, is this dates or times mentioned there?

53630367

Hi,
I'm not sure if the conditional tagging actually means the right thing. Is access fully closed in the morning? Then it should be "access=no".
And vice versa, if everybody is allowed, you need a access:conditional tag.

Cheers, Jan

53639065

Moin,
hier hätten wir einen Weg mit einem Tagging-Fehler, sollte das ein "fixme" werden?
way/539430095

Gruß, Jan

53841777

Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. It is "building" and "condition". Any wrong spelling means that the data is not usable at all!
Please check all your edits, there are hundreds of such mistakes.
See also:
changeset/53364164
changeset/53236939

53615258

Check doch bitte hier mal das Tagging - da ist etwas schiefgegangen:
way/428200381
Jan

53712457

3 ungetaggte Objekte sind übrig: http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22Stand_am%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22Stand_am%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22Stand_am%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B

53576331

Hi,
could you please check these buildings? It looks like you uploaded some of them twice, and one copy has no proper tags, e.g. way/538922549

Cheers
Jan

53570866

Hi,
could you explain what this node represents? I can't make any sense out of the tags.

Thanks
Jan

53753523

Hi,
I guess something went wrong here, many buildings got tags like these:
BFSNr=2701
GWR_EGID=243008474
Qualitaets=AV93
Stand_am=2007
TID=8106
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan

53739361

Hi,
you added 95 objects with the tag 'bottom width'. I guess this should be 'bottom_width', even though this tag is not documented at all.
Please fix this

Jan

53747505

Hi,
ich glaube, diese Schilder heißen gar nicht "WIldruhezone", sondern erklären sie, oder? Dann wäre das "name" Tag nicht richtig sondern "description" (Beschreibung) oder "inscription" (Beschriftung) das passende.
Gruß, Jan

53556260

Hi,
let me know in case you need help.
Here you can find all 7 ways:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sWB

53556260

Hi,
you added several ways with tags like
Layer = 5
R_type =3
Could you fix this and put a proper OSM tag there?

Cheers, Jan

53535600

Hi,
what is the meaning of "Amen Place = yes"? This node has neither a physical nor a name tag. Could you work on the tagging here?
Cheers, Jan

53709988

Hallo Joerg, willkommen bei OSM.
Das Tag "name" ist wirklich nur für den Namen eines Objektes gedacht, nicht zur Beschreibung. In deinem Fall würde sich eventuell ein Tag "operator = DRK Wörrstadt" anbieten, und das "building=yes" könnte gegen ein spezifischeres Tag getauscht werden, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:building

Gruß, Jan

53513432

Hallo,
habe hier ein paar Knoten korrigiert, an denen du 'adr:' oder 'add:' anstelle von 'addr:' geschrieben hast. Ich hoffe ich habe alle erwischt, aber vielleicht schaust du nochmal drüber.

Gruß, Jan

53514145

Ich würde in jedem Fall empfehlen, auf Sonderzeichen (Klammern, Umlaute) im Key zu verzichten, siehe auch dieses aktuelle Thema im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60340