Hi,
the tag " recycling:general" is not used in any other place - what does it mean? If there is nothing 'special' to be recycled, then there is no need to add a tag.

Hi,
the tags
control_point, railway:sign:direction and railway_sign
are not used in other places - could you check if there is a common key for this that is already in use and documented?

Hi,
the app you are using adds wrong tags. It should be 'changing_table' instead of 'baby_changing_table'. Please report this as a bug to the app's developers.

Hi,
the app you are using adds wrong tags. It should be 'changing_table' instead of 'baby_changing_table'. Please report this as a bug to the app's developers.

Something went wrong with your import.
All of the objects are no proper areas, many have been imported at least twice.

Please read and follow our import guidelines!
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange "alpine rock ridge" tag.

Looks like some climbing scale?
osm.wiki/Climbing

Hi,
something went wrong here - this doesn't look like a proper tag:
"mml:class:39110 = source=nls.fi database import"

Hi,
could you check your edits? There are 4 signals with these tags - and their values are contradictory:

railway:signal:combined::type
railway:signal:combined:type

👍

Hi,
I made changes because you used 'ice_skate', not 'ice_skates'.

I don't think 'sport' is limited to e.g. pitches, but generally describes what sport can be done at or is supported by any feature.

Does 'ice_skates=yes' deliver any additional information? Objects are rarely explicitly closed for ice_skates, so 'yes' doesn't give additional information. Usually bans are for entering ice on lakes in general, not just with ice skates.

If you think 'ice_skates' should be tagged here, I can add it back.

Hi,
what does 'splitter = vehicle' mean? This tag isn't used in other places.

Please don't add 47 (!) images to a single object. OSM is not a gallery.
If there are many images, you can link e.g. to a wikimedia_commons category.

Hi,
could you check these edits? All these proposed barriers crossing major roads seem a bit suspicious.

Btw, 'proposed' is a prefix, the proper tag would be 'proposed:barrier'.

I agree that a revert is the proper way to proceed.

Hi,
you added several tags here that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.
"source:maxspeed:named_numbered" or
"source:maxspeed:app"

Could you check and fix this?

Hi,
could you check these edits? "psv=no" contradicts "oneway:bus=no".

Hi,
please don't add dozens of plain translations to name and address tags. The address of an object should be just the official address in the official language of the place (sometimes there are 2 or 3, but never more than 20).
The same goes for the name which should contain only official names in other languages, but no plain translations.

cc-by-4.0 is not suitable for OSM.
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

You need to obtain a special permission using e.g. this letter:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Waiver_and_Permission_Templates/Cover_letter_and_waiver_template_for_CC_BY_4.0

Hi,
I agree that especially for short operator names there might be the risk of conflicts. However, the scheme without 'operator' is by far the most common scheme.
However, if there is some discussion you have my full support for "officially" recommending adding 'operator' to the name tag.

Stimmt hier "parking:right:psv:conditional" wirklich? 'psv' schließt Taxis mit ein, die damit rund um die Uhr dort parken dürfen.

way/1102612746