Hi,
danke für den Hinweis. Diesen Key hatte ich nicht gesehen, weil er schon seit einem Import 2012 existiert (mit yes/no).

Koordinaten von Objekten in Tags sind unnötig, da sich der Knoten ja bereits an der richtigen Stelle befindet. Nur wenn Koordinaten explizit auf dem Objekt vermerkt sind (Vermessungspunkte etc.) kann ein Tag Sinn machen.

Ich wäre dafür diese Tags zu entfernen.

Could you check this way, it got a strange 'ogau' tag:
way/243761489#map=18/49.543112/25.611674

Hi,
"routePoint" is not used in other places. Is this number a kind of gtfs reference or similar?

JOSM doesn't highlight unknown tags - unless they contain other errors like spaces like in this case. I can't simply change them without knowing what a "centre de sante" is in the local context.

There are very few tools that mark random tags as error / warning, but many tools that highlight 'fixme'. The edit made the problem much more visible to most mappers.

Hi,
something went wrong here. Most of this data are duplicates of existing features.
This happens if you load a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try to upload it. You have to load data directly from the API or Overpass - every other way will lead to duplicates and not to editing the already existing objects.

I reverted these changes.

Hi,
what exactly are these survey_points?
node/12870964132

A monitoring station for cell phone signal strength?

Hi,
would you please point us to the discussion and documentation of this massive world-wide retagging of food amenities?
New tags are not introduced by creating a Wiki page and immediately retagging objects all across the world.

A new top-level tag for one special kind of food is a weird choice. There are established tagging schemes that should be followed.

Hi,
die Mühe, alle Tags mit einem "abandoned:" zu versehen brauchst du dir nicht machen.

abandoned:amenity=telephone
und vielleicht noch ein paar Tags welche das Aussehen beschreiben sind völlig ausreichend - alles andere kann weg, da es ja eindeutig keine Chance mehr gibt, dass das jemals noch eine Rolle spielen wird.

Hi,
'recycling:energy_waste' is not in use in other places - what does it mean?

Hi,
could you check this relation, it got a strange tag:

charge:condition = 1.50 GEL

relation/5542871

Hi,
could you check this kerb?
node/11109129468
It has several tags that are not used in other kerbs:
counter = slope: <= 5%
description = Incline: 11%
top = landing: >=60"
two_sided = yes

Welcome to OSM!

These edits look like you dumped a local data set into the OSM database. Unfortunately this is not the correct way to import external data and make it usable within OSM.
Please have a look at our import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

I'll revert these additions for now so that you can first sanitize the data and then reimport it following the mandatory guidelines.

Please don't try to start discussions in 'description' tags.
I removed "maxweight:7.5" because such a tag doesn't exist. There can't be a value inside the key.
The correct form for conditionally different weight restrictions is maxweight:conditional = * @ *

Hi,
could you check this node, it got two ref tags, which one is correct?
node/12850724601#map=19/59.339660/18.037133

Thanks for the explanation. It seems the city map can't be accessed from Germany...

The current tagging is a bit unfortunate, because e.g. 'shoulder' is not used with forward/backward, but always with left/right. But maybe the city comes up with better signage quicker than we can find a proper tag :)

Hi,
'mobile_bakery' is not yet in use in other places.
Have a look for "street_vendor", which also covers this type of amenity traveling around:

street_vendor=yes

Hi,
I don't fully understand the tagging of this way:
way/1207542763

What's the difference in both directions (apart from the traffic signs)? In one direction you tag it as segregated, in the other as pedestrians need to use the shoulder, but the surface is the same everywhere. Do you have a photo of the way?

Welcome to OSM!
Something went wrong here: Instead of editing existing objects, you uploaded a whole new set, duplicating the existing data.

Please only use the integrated download function of JOSM. Don't try to download e.g. a GeoJSON file elsewhere and open it in JOSM - it will result in this kind of duplicated data.

Hi,
please check this node, it got a strange tag:
node/12830021694#map=19/51.267525/-0.282896