Hi,
just a hint: You used the tag combination "building = yes" "wall = no". You can use "building = roof" instead.

Cheers, Jan

Looks fine. I just changed it.

I guess natural=wood is right and the rest can be removed?

Hi,
thanks for the reply. I think the situation is different for this way, have a look to the full history: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34792962
It was natural=wood until a week ago, then all tags were deleted by someone else and you added some new tags. I don't see that this way ever was part of a relation.

Hi,
this way got rather strange tags, could you check and correct that?
way/34792962

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
In this edit, a few mistakes happened.
The tag "amenity=parking" should be put on the area only, but not on all of the nodes the area consists of.
Second, many objects contain many foreign keys which do not belong in the OSM database and should be removed; E.g.
colour=4
elevation=0.000000
entity=LWPolyline
et_id=156
fid_=0
layer=Parking_lots
linetype=Continuous
linewt=25

Could you have a look and correct these issues?
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you check the name of this street? It only has a "nameol" and "old_name" tag.

Cheers, Jan

Moin,
way/127365799
note:motor_vehicle:backward = "Zubringerdienst gestattet"

Ist das nicht das, was OSM unter "destination" versteht? In DE entspricht das dem "Anlieger frei".

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - e.g. you added several buildings with the tag "builing" instead of "building".

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
What did you try to add to the database? All nodes you added have some foreign tags which should not be here, and don't have any meaningful ones.
Jan

Hi,
dieses Tor hat ein merkwürdiges Tag "max4:10". Kannst du da mal nachschauen?
node/4827515404

Jan

Hi,
you put the tag "mofa = n" on this bridge:
way/490496091 (and its other parts)
Is it 'mofa = no' or 'moped = no'?
Jan

Hi,
you added the tag "NaPTANAreaCode" to all of these nodes. I guess this should be converted to "naptan:AtcoCode", as this is a tag used in many other places already.

Jan

Hi,
you added many strange tags here, like these:
EntityHand=AEB
ExtendedEn=3 gros { FACING_3 PTE EXT } FACING_3-E01PTE 109710 38.1 0.0 5 { 0 0 0 0 }
Layer=GROS$
SubClasses=AcDbEntity:AcDbPolyline
What is the meaning of all this?
Also, indoor corridors should be tagged as indoor=corridor, but not as highway=footway.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you added the tag "name:tok" to many countries. Which language does 'tok' refer to? I can't find it in the list of ISO 639 language codes.
Jan

Hi,
this village consists of social facilities only? There are many ways overlapping each other and the objects have tags (like 'facility_t') which don't seem to belong in the OSM database. Could you have a look and correct these issues?

Hi,
bitte denke daran Knoten zu setzen wenn zwei Wege sich kreuzen, z.B. ein Fußweg der eine Straße überquert.
Habe gerade einige solcher Punkte in Michelstadt korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan

Vorsicht beim Korrigieren von diesen duplicate ways - in der Gegend von Würzburg ist das momentane Problem nicht mit ein paar lokalen Edits zu lösen, die machen es eher noch schlimmer weil Reverts nicht mehr möglich sind.
z.B. way/491622891

Gruß, Jan

Bitte füge keine neuen Wege mehr hinzu die mit anderen Wegen überlappen. Hier in der Region ist ein riesiges Chaos entstanden, das ersteinmal beseitigt werden muss.

I know that this is very useful information and we should try to have this information in the database.
You write:
"igac information was used, which is available and can be used under conditions , And one of them is not to lose the original attributes."

I'm sorry to say, but this means that the data set is incompatible with OSM license and has to be removed. OSM allows everybody to take an excerpt of the data (for example, remove your tags) and to redistribute it under the same terms.
Maybe you can convince them to agree to only be mentioned in the changeset and / or on the OSM contributors list in the wiki.