Hi,
the tag "place:vi-class" is not used in any other place.
I guess this is a local classification scheme for villages/hamlets?

I suggest to use the tag "place:VI" - country codes use capital letters. The same scheme is already in use e.g. in China: osm.wiki/Key%3Aplace%3ACN

Hi,
could you explain the access restrictions on this area? Currently this is a highway=pedestrian, that is not accessible for pedestrians.

Hi,
you used 10 new tags here to tag the years inscribed on this post. I would recommend combining them in one tag, separated by ';'.

I'd also suggest to use a more generic tag here: There are other types of memorials remembering a certain day, which don't need to all have their on key to tag the date. How about something simple like "memorial:date"?

Reminder:

You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

Let us know in case you need help!

Hi,
please check the ref tag on this object:
relation/8275821

Hi,
please check your recent edits. Something went very wrong here - the objects didn't get any proper tags, but just a large list of questions.

We should list values only in exceptional cases, so having a long list is not really a problem. I'm pretty sure we'll find cases with no fixed step size. In that case we need to use :values and can't use :interpolation. E.g. a sign that shows 80,100,110 can't be described using :interpolation.

I guess this feature is used so seldomly that it's no problem having a longer list and doesn't warrant having two different keys.

> würde man dann bei hazard:bicycle:both_ways oder hazard:bicycle:both landen?

Weder noch. Ganz einfach "hazard:bicycle". Vergleiche mit einem Tag wie maxspeed: Ohne Suffix gilt es in beiden Richtungen.

left/right bezieht sich immer auf die Seiten eines Objekts (nicht mit dem Begriff Strassenseite für Fahrspuren verwechseln), forward/backward auf die Spuren selbst.

"maxspeed:variable:values" sounds like a good tag.

It's definitely not an "interpolation".
Even "interval" doesn't seem a good choice, because I doubt that all signs use values in regular intervals.

Hi,
regarding the "harassment_prevention" tags, there's a discussion about something that seems very similar in the forums, in German.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/schema-retreat-yes-fur-notinseln-kelly-inseln-renovieren/114170/12
Maybe you could try to join that?

I reverted this import: Most of these nodes overlap with already existing POIs.

Hallo,
bitte checke mal die Autovervollständigung in deinem Editor. Seit einigen Tagen finde ich "sursurveillance" Tags (sind schon korrigiert).

Hallo,
sowohl 'hazard' als auch 'bicycle' werden in der Regel nicht mit left/right benutzt.

Ich nehme an, du meinst, dass das Radfahren in einer Richtung gefährlich ist? Das wäre dann hazard:bicycle:forward.

I already had a look yesterday and fixed the areas according to Bing images. changeset/154809325#map=18/48.02245/-76.58320

The business is for sure a legitimate one, but the way this data ended up in OSM is not. This was just one of several nodes with identical keys and style of tags, all from different new user accounts added within a day. This is just the typical behavior of SEO companies that dump data into OSM and get paid for that. If you are inclined to help them and correct the tags, feel free to do so.

Hi,
could this node be tagged as 'retreat'?
retreat=*

Hi,
I don't understand the meaning of your "parking:right:upon_leaving" tag. Could you explain this in a bit more detail than in the description?
Thank you!

Reminder:

You added many tags here that are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use the tags that are defined in the wiki or available as presets in the editor - only these can be understood by other mappers and applications.
Could you check the objects you edited and change the tagging?

You're always welcome to ask in the forums in case you need help!

Hi, you uploaded a few objects like this one with only foreign tags, could you check that?
way/1304965538

So einen ehemaligen Damm kann man als Linie in OSM eintragen, mit dem Tag
historic:waterway=dam

Alle anderen Tags sollten entfernt werden - heutzutage hat das Überbleibsel ja nichts mehr mit einem tatsächlich nutzbaren Damm zu tun.