Could you check for a better term for this? "seatable" sounds like an English word, but isn't.

Hi,
please have a look at this wall:
way/1202347414

"seatable" is not a common tag and I doubt the wall is 30 meter high.

Hi,
it seems something went wrong here. There are 37 nodes with many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM.
Could you check and fix this?

This seems to be an import, where can we find the mandatory documentation and discussion of the import?

Hi,
please check the areas you added here, several have tags like "COS18n3_C" which don't look like they should be in OSM.

Hi.
please check the tags you added recently. There are many streets with strange tags like "30 = 20".

Hallo,
du hast hier an vielen Gebäuden ein "ags" Tag hinzugefügt. Das gibt es sonst nirgends - was soll es bedeuten?

Hi,
you added the new tag "gabarito" here. What does it mean?

Please make sure that you only use tags that are described in the wiki or those that are available as presets in your editor. Only these tags can be understood by mappers and apps.

Hi,
could you check the tags you added here? It's quite uncommon to add a "_2" at the end of a tag. If it's really necessary to have two source:url tags, it's better to use the much more common "source:url:2" with a colon.

Hi,
you introduced the new tag "conflation" here. What is the meaning of it?

Please make sure you only use those tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. Only these tags can be understood by other mappers and apps.

Please also explain the other new tags like these

DateCreati = 2017-01-25 10:51:19.287+01
NatureSE = Plan d'eau - réservoir
OrigineSE = artificiel
Persistanc = intermittent
gid = 104613

Where are they discussed and documented?

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You introduced a new tag here "type_toiture" - what is this supposed to mean?

In general, please make sure that you only use those tags described in the Wiki or available as presets in your editor. These are the only tags that can be understood by others and all the various software tools.

Hi,
welcome to OSM. You invented a new "b_id" tag here. The common way to tag reference numbers is "ref=123". Could you have a look and change this?

Hi,
you introduced a new tag here - capacity:designated. Could you explain what this refers to?
Thanks!

Hi,
you added a link to an image here - but this won't last long, images on this server will be deleted quite soon after the note has been closed.

Hi,
please check the objects you added - there are more than 20 ways with foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g. this one:

way/1201267345

Please check your imports. Many objects contain foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM, e.g.

CdOH 99S0000000023256080
DateCreati 2006-09-21 07:50:25.715+02
NatureSE Plan d'eau - réservoir
OrigineSE artificiel
Persistanc intermittent
SaliniteSE 0
StatutOH Validé
gid 440664

Hi,
you added the new tags "lhn_ref" and "expected_lhn_route_relations" on 5 objects. Is that a spelling mistake?

Thanks for the explanation!
motor_vehicle and bus are both vehicle categories, which can't be combined in one key.
bus=yes would be sufficient. Or, if you want to make it clear that the conditional really doesn't apply to buses, you could use
bus:conditional = yes @ (24/7)

Danke für den Link. Ich hatte nachgesehen aber bei diesem Titel nicht damit gerechnet.

Hallo Gerd,
du hast hier das neue Tag direction_*:routes verwendet. Das finde ich für die vollen Namen auch völlig in Ordnung, aber könnten wir uns auf den Singular "route" einigen? Das ist bei den meisten Tags ja so üblich, auch wenn es mehrere Einträge gibt.