Hallo,
kannst du einen Blick auf den Namen hier werfen? way/23895705
Da stimmt was am Tagging nich.

Gruss, Jan

Hi,
could you check this way:
way/448964267
The tagging seems a little bit strange.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you check
node/4458094662
Something went wrong with the name tag on this node.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found that you added the tag "charges" to 40 fountains. OSM works best if everybody uses the same tags. For this, the usual key is "fee". Maybe you can have a look and change these nodes? Let us know if you need help!

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you have a look at this building?
way/435203596
The tag 30A = 5 seems wrong.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
you tagged 131 objects with these tags:
building=yes
building:=House
Note the wrong ':' in the second key. Could you have a look and correct this? Let us know if you need help.

Cheers, Jan

Moin,
ich habe gerade dieses Tagging an vielen Nodes gefunden:
frequency:mo-fr06-20=2
frequency:mo-fr20-01=0
frequency:sa20-01=0
frequency:su20-01=0
Diese Tags sind neu.
Was hälst du stattdessen von einem Tagging mittels
service_times für die Zeiten an denen die Haltestelle bedient wird
interval:conditional für die Angabe von verschiedenen Intervallen (wird ohne conditional schon 500 Mal benutzt)
Solche Informationen würde ich aber auch eher an die Buslinien-Relation taggen und nicht an die Haltestelle.

Btw: Bist du dir sicher, dass die Quelle unter einer passenden Lizenz steht?

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
I found tags like these on several objects: Imager_used=imagegeocenter.org
Source=SERVIR
digitization_scale=50m
These tags are usually placed on the changeset and not on every object.
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I found these tags on several ways:
kierunek=RD
ruch1=dalekobieżny
ruch2=towarowy
ruch3=regio
tor=2
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common tags for railways.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan

Hi, could you check the tagging of these ways?
- 'turn:left' does not exist as a key.
- there are two lanes given in turn, but lanes=1

Jan

way/197195006
way/197194995

Please do not invent new tags. Stuff like 'categroy' (note the typo!) is useless for OSM. And even more important: It is obvious that this account has only been registered for this edit. Use one account for all of your edits!

Please do not invent new tags. Stuff like 'categroy' (note the typo!) is useless for OSM. And even more important: It is obvious that this account has only been registered for this edit. Use one account for all of your edits!

Please do not invent new tags. Stuff like 'categroy' (note the typo!) is useless for OSM. And even more important: It is obvious that this account has only been registered for this edit. Use one account for all of your edits!

Hi,
Could you comment on the source of this huge import of historic data? Is the license of the source compatible with ODbL?

Please always add this informartion to the changeset.

Hallo,
Kannst du das Tagging von way/448149639 nochmal überprüfen? Diese Keys sind neu und werden bis jetzt nirgends verwendet. Die Bedeutung erschließt aich mir nicht.

roof:height1 = 1m
roof:height2 = 1m
roof:wight1 = 1
roof:wight2 = 3

Moin, das Tag 'maxwide' am Weg way/448038487 - soll das maxwidth oder maxweight sein?

Hi,
welcome to OSM. You added sevefzl nodes with tags like 'word1' or 'word_4' - unfortunately this is not usable for OSM. If you want your data to show up on maps and be usable by software, you have to use standard tagging, like described in the wiki. Would you review your edits for this? Let me/us know if you need help.

Jan

way/448038556

Hi, i just corrected the spelling of 'tracktype' on 4 ways - but the tagging is grade5 with surface gravel, this doesn't fit. Gravel is usually not worse than grade3. Could you check?

Hi,
looks like you are right. I just removed the tag again.
Jan

Please watch out for the spelling of tags!
In this region I found tags like
addr: postcode
addr:postalcode
addr:Postcode
addr:postcode
addr:Province

These are useless for OSM, because they are all misspelled.
The correct keys are
addr:postcode
addr:province
Only these can be used by automated software!

Jan