Hi Devijver,
I don't understand the tagging of way/396152606. Are these containers to collect glass for recycling? Here is the description on how to tag them:
osm.wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Cheers, Jan

Hi Romain,
node "Le comptoir de l'or (3986133536)" is missing a physical tag - what is it? For example, shop = jewelry?
Cheers, Jan

Hi escada,
I just fixed the spelling of "segregated" on two ways here and noticed way/395544389 has maxspeed = 50 and source:maxspeed=zone70. Could you check that?
Cheers & Happy Mapping,
Jan

Hi,
on way way/27513612 I found the tag "oneayes = substation". Looks like a mistake, but I can't figure out what it meant to be. Could you have a look?
Cheers & Happy Mapping,
Jan

You linked to a proposed feature for which there was a no voting. osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare on the other hand was accepted by many people several years ago and covers exactly the same.

I personally would prefer the latter one, but that might not be consensus in the community - so I guess the correct answer is "follow whichever scheme you like best".

My dictionary lists speciality with 'i' as BE and without 'i' as AE, but that might be wrong.

Hi,
I would like to point out that the key you are using here is not defined in the wiki and is not used anywhere else. According to
healthcare=*
the accepted tagging is
healthcare:speciality=intensive
(Please also note the second 'i' in speciality - OSM uses British English)
Cheers,
Jan

Hallo Florian,
willkommen bei OSM! Eine kleine Anmerkung: Für Öffnungszeiten gibt es den Key "opening_hours" - das hat den Vorteil das die Öffnungszeiten automatisch ausgewertet werden können. Für die Bibliothek habe ich das gerade geändert, bei der Bank noch nicht. Infos findest du im Wiki: osm.wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours Es gibt auch mehrere Tools mit denen du das Tag überprüfen kannst, z.B. http://github.pavie.info/yohours/
Viel Spaß beim Mappen,
Jan

Ach Mist... zweimal Blödsinn direkt hintereinander... kriegst ein Bier falls wir uns mal treffen ;-)

Woops... the original key was " leaf_type" with a space, that's what I wanted to correct but then mistakenly also removed the underscore... Sorry and thanks for the correction!
Jan

change:bus:lanes seems fine to me - arbitrarily excluding vehicles from some tags will never be consistent.

Has this import been described in the wiki or announced on the mailing list?
I don't think "data correction" as changeset comment is appropriate here. Also "source=survey" is definitely wrong.

Hi Mauro,
on two roads, e.g. way/391804934 , you added the key "wheight" which is obviously a mistake - should that be width, maxheight, maxwidth or maxweight?
Jan

Hi,
change:lanes:bus is not a valid key - :lanes is a suffix while the transportation mode is added after the base key, e.g. maxspeed:hgv:lanes:forward. change:bus:lanes doesn't exist in the database either, but uses the common syntax.
Jan

Hi coenie,
First of all, if nobody else said it before: Welcome to OSM!

on some buildings I found the tag " building:levels\=2 = commercial" which should be written differently:
building:levels = 2
building = commercial
I just fixed that for you.

Cheers & Happy Mapping,
Jan

What exactly do you call "automatic process"? You found the key in Taginfo and loaded the ways in JOSM? If you have a look at each object, scan its tags for validity, make sure the retagging does not destroy information and makes sense - then everything is fine and you helped OSM to have a more consistent tagging.
To me this changeset was completely valid as is.

Hi Nadeem,
could you explain this import of 908 ways, which all lie on top of existing roads and do not carry any standard OSM tag?
Jan

Hi Chriss,
why did you revert this correction of an obviously misspelled key? The discussion in the changeset about telephone-keys did not relate to changes like this one.
Jan

Hallo mapwatch01@OSM,
ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen zu deinen Edits hier:
- ich glaube nicht, dass die Brinkstraße und der Vennkampweg Landesstraßen sind, highway=secondary kann damit nicht stimmen.
- wenn dir eine Eigenschaft von einer Ampel nicht bekannt ist, ist es unnötig das mit einem Tag kenntlich zu machen. z.B. "traffic_signals:sound=unknown" sollte weggelassen werden.
- du benutzt traffic_signals:foot und traffic_signals:motor_vehicle (ohne "s"!). Was möchtest du damit sagen? Du vergisst damit die restlichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, z.B. Radfahrer. Ampel gelten generell für alle Personen, das muss also nicht in einem Tag angegeben werden.
Möchtest du die Ampel als Fußgängerampel kennzeichnen, so gibt es dafür das Tag "crossing=traffic_signals", das aber auch nicht notwendig ist.
Gruß, Jan

Hi,
the addresses added here have a wrong key: "add:place" should be "addr:place"
Jan

Ist dieser Weg wirklich auf der gesamten Länge entfernt worden? Da führen jetzt insgesamt vier Wege ins Leere...