It's not hiding the information - in contrary, it makes it visible. JOSM shows it now as a special icon, and also iD can list it for the casual user you doesn't look in the list of all tags.

Would you please stop reverting the work of others without discussion? A 'description' tag is exactly the right place to list the amenities a park has to offer.

This was not a 'mechanical edit'. I did it deliberately by hand. Undocumented tags are useless in OSM. And I'm very willing to communicate.

Would you please check the edits and not reintroduce wrong tags by doing reverts blindly? And: if you comment a changeset of another user, please wait for an answer, otherwise discussion is pointless.

There is a reason that currency:others=yes doesn't exist in the wiki. The only value is 'no', indicating that all currencies available are mentioned in the tags and none are missing.

The tag 'visible_in' is not in use elsewhere and not defined anywhere. A note on the other hand is shown in all editors to make any other mapper aware of the problem. I just moved the existing information to a place visible to others.

There is no need for a new tag 'service_times:mass' - that's by definition 'service_times'.

Perfect, this was the reason for the update yesterday, see: https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/122

Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan

Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan

Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan

Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan

Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "communication:communication:mobile_phone". Please update the app.

Jan

Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "recycling:recycling:glass_bottles". Please update the app.

Jan

Hi,
deine Version von GoMap hat einen Bug und produziert falsche Tags wie "recycling:recycling:glass_bottles".

Hallo,
das Tag "goods:conditions:maxweight" gibt es nicht. Was ist da genau vor Ort ausgeschildert?
way/25361693

Wahrscheinlich ist
maxweight = 5 oder
maxweight:hgv = 5 richtig.

Gut, bei selbst erhobenen Daten gibt es keine Lizenzprobleme. Am besten immer direkt im changeset mit angeben, dann gibt es da keine Unklarheiten.
Über das Tagging solltest du / ihr nochmal drüberschauen:

X_COORD = 17645.679
Y_COORD = 22021.8273
Diese Tags gehören nicht in OSM, die Position ergibt sich ja aus der Position des Knotens.

fire_hydrant:position = gegenüber Bezirkshauptmannschaft
Dieser Key ist nicht für eine längere Beschreibung gedacht. Dafür wäre z.B. fire_hydrant:note besser geeignet

pillar:type= wet_barrel
pillar_type =wet_barrel
Die erste Variante ist richtig, die zweite falsch.

water_source: = main
Der Doppelpunkt gehört da nicht hin

Hallo,
woher stammen diese Daten? "knowledge" ist es wohl eher nicht. Bitte denke immer daran, dass alle externen Quellen unter einer Lizenz stehen müssen, die mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel ist.
Gruß, Jan

I'm not a full expert on this, but it might be
osm.wiki/OSM-4D/Roof_table#Roofs_with_2_faces
roof:shape = side_hipped (521 times in OSM)
If you could provide a good image?

Hi,
could you check this way and its name tag?
way/462780880

Cheers, Jan