OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
57174106

When are you going to fix this? I don't see why volunteers have to clean the mess created by professionals who are paid for the job!

57580124

Hi,
the tag
"tower:observation:forest_fire=yes"
is new and not used in other places.
We do have some
"observation = firewatch" in the database. Maybe you want to change your tag?

Cheers, Jan

57525644

Hi,could you check the tagging of this node:
node/267741447
Jan

57530192

Hi,
this import of fire hydrants contains many Russian tags - could you translate them to common ones? Remember that all tags have to use the documented, English names. A list of tags can be found here: emergency=fire_hydrant

Jan

57537093

I consider passwords of any kind private information that does not belong into the OSM database. I'm very sure, the offer of free wifi is for customers of this restaurant, but not for any person finding the key on the internet. Did you check with the owner that he is fine with sharing this information with people world-wide so that anybody passing by is able to use the internet on his expense without personally asking and/or buying anything?

57492185

Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM! Bitte nimm dir etwas Zeit und lies im Wiki wie Objekte mit Tags versehen werden müssen. Es dürfen nur solche Tags verwendet werden, wie sie dokumentiert sind. Alles andere kann keine Software auswerten.
Z.B. diese Informationen sind zur Zeit nicht nutzbar:

Garten 4 eingezäunte Gärten
Gartenmöbel ja
Hunde Urlaub mit Hund
Kamingrill ja
rooms 2 Ferienwohnungen
strandkorb 4 Strandkörbe am Sandstrand
tourism apartments;apartment
website http://ruegen-hunde-urlaub.de und http://duenenvilla.de;http://www.duenenvilla.de

Außerdem: In das "name" Tag gehört nur der wirkliche Name eines Objekts, keine Beschreibungen wie "Sußweg Dünenvilla Sommerhaus".

Gruß, Jan

57465512

Hi,
I can't make sense of the tag "valor = pasta" on this shop:
way/459236292
Is that a mistake?

Jan

57437158

Hi,
something went wrong with the name tag here, could you check that?
way/238362209

Jan

57335513

Did you read the guidelines for importing data from other sources?
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

57335513

Hi,
could you please point me to the Wiki page detailing this import?
It looks like it generates lots of problems.
- There is a huge amount of foreign tags which shouldn't appear in OSM (like "Shape_Length")
- I found "parks" consisting of a two nodes about 10 cm apart
- I found nodes with building and address tags on them (which were just the outline of a forest)

Jan

57367325

Hallo,
nein, da gibt es keine gute Übersicht, deswegen habe ich meine Seite ja geschrieben.
Ich bin dabei von den spärlichen, spezifischen Angaben im Wiki ausgegangen und den Häufigkeiten der einzelnen Keys laut Taginfo. Der Datenbestand ist relativ sauber was die Reihenfolge angeht.

Deinen Edit habe ich auch nur gefunden, weil diese Reihenfolge im Augenblick nicht in der Datenbank zu finden war.

57351602

Hi,
could you check this school? The tag "ks" looks like a mistake.
way/31348937

Jan

57367325

Hallo,
bzgl. deiner "note:motor_vehicle:conditional:forward": Ja, die Syntax des Wertes ist in Ordnung, der Key sollte aber
"motor_vehicle:forward:conditional" sein - die Reihenfolge von Suffixen ist allgemein

key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways][:conditional][:start|:end]=*

Gruß, Jan

57228005

Hi,
you used the tag "designation:ca" on two relations - I don't think this is right. ':ca' is the suffix for Catalan language and the value seems to be French.
Jan

57330511

Hi,
could you check this way?
way/571100560
'maxspeed:p' looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan

57303081

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tags APBP_approved and aPBP_approved ? These are new and not used in other places.

Thanks, Jan

57291905

Moin,
node/706714156
wind = yes

Meinst du monitoring:wind = yes?

57257023

Hi,
I noticed several objects with tags like
Lint_review
libt_review
line_review
linr_review
lint_review
lInt_review

Could you explain what this means?
Jan

57306813

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here. These lines all have no valid tags, just some imported ones. They seem to resemble administrative borders, but these are already mapped with much higher precision. Can these lines be deleted?

Jan

57335323

Hallo,
der Tag 'nickname:XX' ist neu und nirgendswo in Benutzung. Wenn es ein lokal bekannter Name wäre, wäre "loc_name" korrekt.
Ich bezweifele aber sehr, dass z.B. Rostock einen vietnamesischen Kosenamen hat.
Außerdem sind Namenszusätze wie "Hansestadt" bereits korrekt mit "name:prefix" erfasst, da braucht es keinen neuen, zusätzlichen Tag.

Gruß, Jan