Hi,
could you check this way and its name? The tag doesn't look right:
way/181200720

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
please let me add that there is no need to put a "source" tag on every object - once in the changeset is sufficient.
I also don't see the purpose of the tag "scala". OSM doesn't have a scale, it's just a database.

Jan

Thanks!
It's a bit hard to see, but from Bing images I guess there are three lanes? So, this is the full tagging, describing the whole sign:
lanes = 3
turn:lanes = left|through|through;right
destination:lanes = Retorno|Centro|Avenida Fernandes Lima;Aeroporto;Centro;
destination:symbol:lanes = ||;airport;
destination:colour:lanes = ||;brown;
destination:arrow:lanes = ||right;right;through

Notes: I didn't list 'green' as colour because this is the default for Brasil (I guess). Same is for the not listed arrows: These can be found in the turn:lanes tag.

There is also the key 'via' to name intermediate stops.

Please stop this import. As mentioned in this comment, it produces a huge amount of crap data in the database.
changeset/54936029

Hi,
you used the key "gone:railway" for this railway. 'gone' is none of the usual lifecycle prefixes - If the rails have been removed, it should be "railway = razed", see osm.wiki/Demolished_Railway

Jan

Hi,
you added several ways with the tag "Ekonomiska = kartan" - could you check these? Looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
is it necessary to keep these areas with a tag "finished = construction"? If there is no construction site any more, I think they can be removed. Your tag is completely new and undocumented.

Jan

Alles klar, ich habe eine Note gesetzt.
Laut Mapillary steht da zumindest irgendein rundes Schild kurz vor der Kreuzung, leider von hinten aufgenommen.

Please stop adding experimental stuff to the OSM database. See also
changeset/54989640

Hi,
I found a strange tag on two ways here:
parking:condition:right:maxspeed= 30 mph
I hope parked cars don't move at all :-)
Could you check that?

E.g. way/250098973

Cheers, Jan

And, you added the tag "amenity:drinking_water=drinking water". This should be "amenity=drinking water".

Let me know if you need help fixing these issues.

Hi,
I saw that you put the tag "name_water" on many water holes and pumps. This tag is not used in any other place yet and not interpreted by any software I'm aware of.
Shouldn't it be just "name"?

Jan

Hier ist wohl noch etwas Nacharbeit nötig, an vielen Stationen in Frankfurt gibt es nun Fehlermeldungen wegen unverbundenen Wegen und falschen Layer-Angaben.
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=16&lat=50.15785&lon=8.65715&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C50%2C130%2C191%2C195%2C196%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C231%2C232%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C402&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1

Maybe the author of that wiki page can help? @Pavel47

Hi,
could you explain the change on this node?
node/597018299
You removed the address and added an undocumented tag "south Bay Community Church = South Bay Community Church".
Please have a look to the wiki how churches have to be tagged:
amenity=place_of_worship

Thanks, I'll change it to "highway=razed", that's the typical tag for a removed highway.

Hi,
the tag "for:addr:housenumber' is new. There is somebody in Russia who uses "post:housenumber": node/4436294626
You might want to use this tag as well?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I'm confused by this tagging:
way/540008710

Is there a highway (now) or is it still under construction or is it gone?

Jan

Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
node/5310422717
Looks like a mistake...
Cheers, Jan