Hi,
you put the tag "dsscreated=#brunch" on several POIs, could you explain it?

Btw, please have a look to the Wiki about tagging of opening_hours - there is a well defined syntax to make it machine-readable.

Jan

Hi,
you put these tags on some ways:

maxweight = 3.5
maxweight:condition = yes @ service
The conditional tag doesn't seem to be right (yes is not a valid value for maxweight and @ service is not defined)

Can you explain what you want to tag here?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
schaust du hier mal nach dem Versuch des Öffnungszeiten-Taggings? way/496768509
Gruß, Jan

Hi,
could you checkt the tagging of this way?
way/494161242
The tag looks a bit strange:
"3 = cement_block"

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
these 115 ways have the key "operater", which should read "operator". Could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I found the tags
"Gresham Street=no" and "Winchester Walk = no" in your edits. Could you explain this?

Thanks, Jan

Großteils korrigiert in changeset/49227401
Direkt am Platz östlich der Burg stimmt noch eine Kleinigkeit nicht, und die living_street-Fläche mit durchgehenden Straßen sieht merkwürdig aus, liegt aber nicht an diesem Changeset.

Hi,
these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
did you really mean "bear = yes"?
And, could you move the node to one side of the road? I guess the restaurant is not in the middle of the street?

Hi,
hier gibt es einige Nodes mit ungewöhnlichen Tags wie "GB 58; GH = path". Könntest du da mal nachschauen und korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan

Hi,
you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case.

Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3"

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I found several objects with very strange tags here, e.g.
way/496152016
area=89.7593806393
cota_p_a=55.41
fotografia=0
gid=44424
id_edifica=44424
id_lev=0.0
latlon=40°32'4.418"N 8°27'43.439"W
perimetro=56.7555541766
refer_elev=cercea
uso=Edificio
v_crsi=PT_CASC / OH
valor_elev=55.09

All of them look foreign and the objects doesn't have any common OSM tag. Could you check that?

Jan

Alright, I changed it back.

Hi,
both versions are in use. The reason for my edit was your spelling mistake "constraction"

You're right, that's strange. I didn't put the tag there. I fixed the spelling of the key, but didn't notice it being strange for a building.

We have to ask rowers2, e.g. in this changeset: changeset/48947839

Siehe changeset/48979895

Dann kommentiere ich auch hier und nicht in meinem Changeset:
Erst highway = proposed, dann highway = construction (zunächst mit Tippfehler den ich korrigiert habe). Die letzte Änderung von t2425 verstehe ich nicht ganz, aber das hast du dann ja wieder geradegezogen.

Hi,
you uploaded many objects with very strange tags here, like these:

addr:place 02050
building tran thanh toan
highway dhok
landuse 16092737352
place 0340302730
shop 56/26

This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted?
Jan

Hi,
you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I saw this way:
way/495243526
The tag "loading zone = yes" doesn't exist yet.
Would these tags be what you try to express?
highway = service
area = yes
vehicle = delivery
?