mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 145863057 | Hi,
|
|
| 145799202 | Hi,
|
|
| 146043093 | There are several substations with strange tags: not:operator:wikidata = Q1486956
It seems to be the wikidata reference of the operator of the facility - the tag for this is "operator:wikidata". |
|
| 145951009 | Hallo,
|
|
| 145343740 | Hi,
|
|
| 145262810 | Hi,
|
|
| 145617346 | Hi,
- the decimal separator is a dot, not a comma. i.e. "1.3 m", not "1,3 m"
|
|
| 145407338 | Hi,
|
|
| 145041189 | Hi,
|
|
| 144996311 | Hi,
|
|
| 144955068 | Thanks, I replaced 32 tags:
|
|
| 144955068 | Hi,
|
|
| 145530282 | That wasn't intentional. In Level0 it's not always easy to keep track of the location of edits, especially if the objects are similar and the map doesn't give clear hints on the different location. |
|
| 144703106 | Hi,
|
|
| 144522768 | Hi,
|
|
| 145349201 | That's a 6 year old abandoned proposal that has never been discussed or voted on. A huge edit like this that replaces a well established tag needs to be discussed and agreed on between all the users of the tag - currently almost 30,000 traffic signs in Spain are lost to any application that follows the documented way of tagging. traffic_sign=* |
|
| 145349201 | Hi,
|
|
| 144827138 | Hi,
Thanks! |
|
| 144291120 | Das ist wohl auch nur eine deutsche Namenserfindung. Im Englischen dürfte das Verfahren "unpackaged returns" oder ähnlich heißen. Ich frage mich aber, ob das als so einfacher Tag überhaupt sinnvoll ist: Das ganze gilt ja nur für Rücksendungen an ein paar wenige Unternehmen, also sollte wohl deren Name im Wert angegeben werden. |
|
| 144291120 | Hallo,
|