OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
46465811

I just corrected the obvious spelling mistake in the key.
'number_of_apartments' is already used 1800 times, so I consider it a valid tag. I don't know if there are cases where someone distinguished between number of rooms and number of apartments on a single object.

46338725

Hi,
if you want to tag names in foreign languages: The language has to be given as ISO-639 code, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cree_language has the code 'cr' and Innu has 'moe'.

Cheers, Jan

46331022

Hi,
welcome to OSM. Most of the tags you put on this node are rather useless, because they don't follow established tagging styles. Please have a look to the Wiki, e.g. osm.wiki/Map_Features. There is a list of common tags.

Cheers, Jan

46342075

Hi,
could you check this node?
node/2699648841
It has two contradicting tacticle_paving tags.

Cheers, Jan

46301288

Hi,
I would like to point you to this Wiki page that describes how charging stations for electric cars can be tagged:
amenity=charging_station
Cheers, Jan

45313877

I think that this changeset has to be reverted - we can not make sure that the license of this data is compatible with ODbL if you don't disclose your source.

46283787

Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "hiter=ter" you put on several ways here?

Jan

46264239

Hi,
you managed to get three spelling mistakes in this turn restriction: relation/6997873

Actually, you don't need this relation, it is better to add access tags to the short service way. E.g. access=emergency.

46278261

Hi,
this way got two distance tags, one is misspelled. Could you check which one is right?
node/3115311666

If there are two values given, you can add them to the same tag, separated by ';'

Jan

46289391

Hi,
all the objects have the tag "Horta = Vella" - was this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan

46285364

Hi,
you used highway=project here - this tag is not used often. There are other values that are defined in the wiki, maybe you can change the tagging to one of these?
planned
proposed
preproposed
construction

Cheers, Jan

46239859

Hallo,
kannst du hier nach dem Namen schauen? Da scheint etwas beim Tagging schiefgegangen zu sein.
way/38805790

Gruß, Jan

46398492

Hi,
you imported a lot of points with elevation data in this changeset.
Please note that the tagging is wrong and because of that these points can not be used in OSM. Elevations are tagged using the 'ele' key. Sources should be given in the changeset source tag, but not individually on each of the hundreds of points. Additionally, the source you state doesn't show any information on the data you imported.

46221259

Hi, could you check this way?
way/30833729
Something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan

46274474

Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht:
osm.wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein klein wenig dienlich *), aber um die Logik des Schildes abzubilden schon.

*) in DE: d:ref=A1 -> blaues Schild, d:ref:to =A1 -> gelbes Schild mit blauem Feld

46193990

Hi,
you used the keys railway:date_start and :date_end. The usual key for this is railway:start_date and :end_date.
Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan

46166360

Hi,
these 62 buildings have a spelling mistake in the tags: 'add:province' instead of 'addr:province'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan

46274474

Hi,
habe hier gerade ein paar 'backwart' in 'backward' korrigiert.

Und ein kleiner Tipp:
way/121635637
Die Angabe der Autobahn hier ist ein Fall für destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to weil es sich um einen Hinweis auf eine zu erreichende, aber entfernte Straße handelt.

46297946

If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software.
Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The website you mention explicitly states "License not specified".

46297946

Hi,
this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import.

Jan