mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 46465811 | I just corrected the obvious spelling mistake in the key.
|
|
| 46338725 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 46331022 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 46342075 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 46301288 | Hi,
|
|
| 45313877 | I think that this changeset has to be reverted - we can not make sure that the license of this data is compatible with ODbL if you don't disclose your source. |
|
| 46283787 | Hi,
Jan |
|
| 46264239 | Hi,
Actually, you don't need this relation, it is better to add access tags to the short service way. E.g. access=emergency. |
|
| 46278261 | Hi,
If there are two values given, you can add them to the same tag, separated by ';' Jan |
|
| 46289391 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 46285364 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 46239859 | Hallo,
Gruß, Jan |
|
| 46398492 | Hi,
|
|
| 46221259 | Hi, could you check this way?
|
|
| 46274474 | Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht:
Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein klein wenig dienlich *), aber um die Logik des Schildes abzubilden schon. *) in DE: d:ref=A1 -> blaues Schild, d:ref:to =A1 -> gelbes Schild mit blauem Feld |
|
| 46193990 | Hi,
|
|
| 46166360 | Hi,
Cheers, Jan |
|
| 46274474 | Hi,
Und ein kleiner Tipp:
|
|
| 46297946 | If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software.
|
|
| 46297946 | Hi,
Jan |