Dankeschön! Habe auch die anderen Wege dort noch angepasst, das ist mir mit Relatify wohl passiert.
changeset/141252053
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141242975

Hallo, ich habe deine Änderungen revertiert und access=no ergänzt. Siehe dazu bitte: osm.wiki/User:Nakaner/Positionspapier_Geheimhaltung#Warum_werden_diese_Objekte_erfasst?_Warum_werden_sie_nicht_gel%C3%B6scht?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141063468

Hi, du hast hier übrigens diesen Knoten gelöscht und damit die Straße um 21 Meter unterbrochen. Siehe: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1AfU
Behoben mit changeset/141167534

But then it would not be "access=no" but "vehicle=no", right?

Hi, bezüglich der Änderung der SAC-Skala hier: way/129023299

Sind dort Stellen mit Seilen oder Ketten gesichert, braucht man die Hände für das Gleichgewicht und existieren dort Geröllflächen oder Stellen mit Absturzgefahr?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141032844

Hi, are you sure the surface of the helipad is cobblestone?
See: surface=cobblestone
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141028291

Added the suitable relations: changeset/141116394
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140811929

Hi jeka, hatten wir nicht besprochen, dass ein landuse keine Adresse hat?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140463240

Hi, I've partially reverted this changeset as "fee=yes" is not correct here as there is already a conditional restrictions therefore.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140487184

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Danke!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140807747

Hi, there is no speed camera at this position. Are the coordinates correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140811929

Hi, what exactly is the signage here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140813409

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, warum schreibst du in der Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes immer nur "Details added"? Hier wäre doch "Viehgitter am Netschelweg ergänzt" viel passender.
Schau dir auch mal diese Seite an: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Hi, die offizielle ref laut Datenblatt der Landesregierung lautet 48.074 (https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/48_Laterns/48.074.pdf). Stimmen deine Änderungen? Dann wäre das offizielle Datenblatt falsch.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107005

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, laut dem offiziellen Datenblatt des Wegweisers von der Landesregierung ist die ref "64.022". Siehe https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/64_Rankweil/64.022.pdf
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141102258