mcliquid's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
149310588	almost 2 years ago	Ich sehe schon, dass ist wohl ein Darstellungsproblem im iD-Editor. "Pfad" ist hier komplett richtig. Wichtig sind die Zusatztags "bicycle=designated" und "foot=designated". Schau dir gern mal im Wiki die zweite Zeile dazu an: osm.wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Wege Ich ändere das mal fix zurück. Danke dir für deine Antwort :)
150310332	almost 2 years ago	Wurde bereits von dir geändert.
150311335	almost 2 years ago	Hi Langlaeufer, ist hier angepasst: changeset/150336971
150329496	almost 2 years ago	Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
149310588	almost 2 years ago	Das Bild ist natürlich schon etwas älter, aber zumindest von Süden hing hier noch ein 240er: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=341844617291523
149310588	almost 2 years ago	Laut deinem Tagging wäre hier "DE:239,1022-10" richtig, also ein Fußgängerschild mit Zusatzzeichen "Radfahrer frei", stimmt das?
149310588	almost 2 years ago	Hi, dein erfasstes Tagging entspricht nicht dem Verkehrszeichen (traffic_sign=DE:240), was gilt hier nun? way/210833895 Danke!
150287307	almost 2 years ago	Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
150273869	almost 2 years ago	Good insight. In principle, wouldn't it be possible to make the changes at least continentally? The effort involved would be very limited.
150259733	almost 2 years ago	Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
150227361	almost 2 years ago	Ich hab noch ein paar Tags per Wiki ergänzt: changeset/150230381
149958852	almost 2 years ago	Nach kurzer Nachfrage in der Community reicht hier ein "railway=level_crossing" pro Schnittpunkt. Es verhält sich hier identisch wie mit "highway=crossing", da jeder Schnittpunkt ein Konflikt darstellt. Eine zusätzliche Schranke braucht es hier nicht. Viele Grüße
149958852	almost 2 years ago	Grüß dich, können wir besser angeben, um was es sich für Barrieren hier handelt? node/11813924527 Sonst wird hier bei manchen Routing-Apps ein Umweg gemacht. Danke dir!
149958858	almost 2 years ago	Hallo, wäre hier railway=razed nicht besser gewesen? railway=razed osm.wiki/Demolished_Railway
121445658	almost 2 years ago	Danke dir!
150172762	almost 2 years ago	Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
150124493	almost 2 years ago	Why do you delete the residential roads completely and then redraw them? That's a shame for the history of the roads, isn't it?
150117728	almost 2 years ago	Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
121445658	almost 2 years ago	Ich möchte nicht versprechen, dass ich alle ausgewählt habe, aber dass hier sind die aus meiner Sicht bereits vorhandenen gewesenen: way/431790832 way/431790813 way/431790838 way/431790845 way/431790850 way/431790810 way/431790404 way/431790829 way/431790852 way/431790831 way/431790408 way/431790839 way/431790826 way/431790846 way/431790847 way/431790844 way/431790823 way/431790827 way/431790840 way/431790853 way/431790849 way/431790835 way/431790819 way/431790837 way/431790815 way/431790811 way/431790818 way/431790843 way/431790841 way/431790851 way/431790828 way/431790833 way/431790812 way/431790816 way/431790414 way/431790406 way/431790411 way/431790825 way/431790409 way/431790412 way/431790407 way/431790405 way/431790413 way/431790830 way/431790415 way/431790417
121445658	almost 2 years ago	Deine Stahlschneebrücken sind hier alle doppelt. Da waren schon welche aus 2016/2019. Macht das Sinn die doppelt zu haben?