Hi,

Is this bridge really scheduled to be under construction for 3 years?

Hi,

This note is questioning whether way/1057240215 is indeed a oneway road: note/4099514

Can you confirm your edit was not a mistake?

Hi, thanks for contributing to the map!

Please try to give meaningful comments to your changesets. Usually, this means at least one noun AND one verb. For example here, you make it much easier for others to understand your intentions if you added a verb like "add paths" or "remove paths" or "add surface tags to paths" or "refine path geometry", etc.

Oh sure, if this is an ongoing project that you're working on, I'd leave it up to you. I can't speak for other mappers, but I personally find it acceptable if you use this non-standard naming temporarily while you're finishing the project if that helps you.

Seems to resolve note/3972249

Hi, seems like the name of relation/15624185 contains the ref. Can we change the name to "Pot kurirjev in vezistov NOV Slovenije"?

Hi, you've mapped a lot of fictional roads here. On Openstreetmap, we only map things that presently exist.

Hi, can you help with this note? note/3912780

No response. Name removed.

Hi,

Has Ižanska been reopened or is it still under construction?

Hi,
Thanks for your edit.

Turn restrictions are mapped as relations in OSM: osm.wiki/Relation:restriction

Otherwise, routing apps don't know "from where to where" the restriction applies.

Happy mapping!

Looks like a mistake. I've removed the tags from the nodes. changeset/146177204

Hi,
Is this section of the motorway really called "Sava"?
way/34907615

Hi Ana,

Thanks for joining OSM. You seem to have a made a mistake here: You tagged all the nodes of the bathing area instead of only tagging the way that is made up by these nodes.

What do you mean by "better"?

There is a consensus that we map things only if they can be verified on the ground. If there aren't any visible remains, it should not be on OSM: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

See also "Such features will still have some physical form reflective of their former use visible in the landscape." in the documentation of the abandoned:* prefix: abandoned:=**#Description

Hi,

This part of the railway seems to be completely gone with no visible traces anymore. Can it be removed from the map?

way/884223244

I faintly remember that there is a quest in Street Complete which does this. But I don't know of any tools in JOSM or iD or a web browser GUI.

True, it would be nice to have an online map explorer that highlights outdated check_date and opening_date tags. You could ask on the community forum.

Hi Badojo,

You've mapped way around way/1208019773 as a dual carriageway. Imagery shows that there is no physical separation between the two directions; hence, it should be mapped as only one carriage way. Has this recently changed to a dual-carriageway or is this a mapping mistake?

No response.

Reverting to turn:lanes=through|through|right .

Hi,

Correct would be to keep the type of highway:

highway=construction
construction=tertiary

I've just done that.

Happy mapping!