Hi,

You changed the highway type of Slovenska cesta to living_street. May I ask on what grounds? According to the wiki, it would imply that pedestrians have the right of way over other road users; which I think this is not the case.

In a previous discussion about Slovenska cesta, we had settled on not using living_street: changeset/103082368

Are there good reasons to revert that?

Ok, I've done that.

The tag is already in use, but not widespread. Best would be if somebody documented it on the wiki in a few lines.

I agree with your reasoning.

How about tagging it natural=basin then?

Aerial imagery shows there are steps. Reverting the edit.

Then, why do you keep highway=steps?

Then, the correct tag would be access=private. But what about pedestrians? Are they allowed to pass? I'm reverting this because the changeset comment contradicts the tagging.

Not even by foot? Is privately owned? I'm reverting this because I believe this is a tagging mistake.

Please describe in more detail. Is this under construction? Can only cars not access? What about pedestrians? Or bikes?

I'm reverting this as it seems likely this is a tagging mistake.

1) Please do not add access=no to highway=construction.

highway=construction is sufficient.

2) Make sure the highway classification survives. To do so, add construction=secondary (in this case).

Hi,
please read the wiki documentation about the tags that are relevant to your edits. These roads should be tagged with construction=secondary

highway=construction?uselang=en#How_to_map

Hey,

I'm reverting your change for the following reasons.
1) It is unclear what you intended to do. The changeset comment "okay" does not provide much information on your intentions.
2) Your tagging seems erratic: You tagged way/39728039 and way/39728039 with access=yes. It is unclear what's the value of this tag. It is implied on most highways and certainly on highway=secondary. You tagged way/1184995468 with access=no. This is very broad. Can pedestrians not pass here? What about bikes? In additions, you use the construction=minor tag on the same way. The wiki says this is of roads which remain open during construction. This contradicts your access=no tag.

It would be useful if you familiarize yourself with basic OSM conventions. It appears to me that you are trying to "tune" the map to your own needs without having any genuine interest in the project.

Openstreetmap is a map by the public for the public. Changes on the map should be improvements to everybody, not just to yourself. This requires a minimal degree of willingness to collaborate with the community.

Hi,
You've made Rjava cesta a oneway road where it crosses the motorway. This looks like a mistake to me. I'm reverting it. Please let me know if I'm wrong here.

Thanks a lot for swift action.

What about that closed=yes tag?

Also, are you aware the bicyle=yes overrides access=no on way/225051694? This means that you can pass the bridge by bike but not by any other means of transport (not even by foot). Is this correct?

My questions are sincere -- I do not know the actual situation on the ground.

Hi,

Thanks a lot for updating the map.

I've noticed that you use the undocumented closed=yes tag. I'm wondering what's the meaning of the tag and which additional information does it add in combination with the access=no and damage:date=* tags that you use on the same objects?

Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

It seems that you've accidentally moved this node: node/9001431437

As a consequence, this embankment got weirdly distroted: way/931166949

This is just to notify you so you have a chance to avoid similar mistakes in the future. :-)

Thanks for your contribution. Happy mapping!

Hi,
Tagging nodes connecting different highways with junction=yes and nothing else is discouraged. I'm thus removing the tag from node/4450443319

Hi,
Thanks for adding sidewalks. When doing so, please remember to:
- connect footways to other ways
- If you map sidewalks on either side of the road (or if the road has a sidewalk on only one side): add sidewalk=separate and foot=use_sidepath tags to the carriageway
- add footway=sidewalk and name=* to the sidewalk

Happy mapping!

Hi again,

You've added a lot of cycle infrastructure here, great!

On cycleways, it is important to add the oneway=yes tag when they are only usable in one way. Otherwise, routing apps will direct the user on ways that they are not allowed to use in their direction. You have to make sure, the way points in the correct direction when doing that.

A good practice is it to always map sidewalks and cycle tracks on the right hand side of the road in forward direction and on the left hand side in backward direction (except in countries with opposite traffic flow, obviously).

I think there is no urgency to remove them.

But yeah, they shouldn't be there, so probably good to remove them in the long run.