Hi,

Welcome to Openstreetmap -- help is always much appreciated.

A couple of things to get started:

1) Try to make small changesets so people can understand what you do.

2) Don't do changes that you don't understand (yet).

Some things are straightforward in OSM, for example creating normal buildings

Other concepts are rather complicated and require a lot of experience with OSM, for example public transport routes.

Try to start easy and build up skill gradually. You made some changes to bus routes which seem incorrect, for example you added the tag public_transport:version=2 to relation/7489858 But this tag is wrong (the route does not adhere to the PTv2 standard osm.wiki/w/index.php?oldid=1550843)

Anyways, welcome once more and happy mapping!

Thanks.

It seems you've just forgot oneway:bicycle=no and oneway:bus=no

For example this one: relation/13133202

Hi,

You made Poljanska cesta a one-way street. However, there are currently bus relations passing from east to west through this section of the street.

Is your one-way tag a mistake or have the bus routes changed recently?

Hi,

"I have a spreadsheet of the changes that I do in Openstreet maps and the dates when construction should end."

When should the construction end for Ižanska?

Great, thanks for the quick response.

Hey,
You mapped a path along this beach here, which is disconnected between
way/857784753
and
way/642175978

Can you help with this note maybe?
note/3766571

Hey,

The result of the poll suggest that the community quite clearly discourages adding address tags on rental stations. (Although I erroneously asked about bike rental stations, I assume that the same goes for car rental stations)

You could start a thread in the forum and find out whether an address scheme like informal:addr:street=* + informal:addr:housenumber=* would get more support. (I don't currently have the capacity to do this, sorry)

Hi,

Is this bike rental station distinct from node/8712805703 ?

Looks like there is only a non-public delivery parking at this location, no bike rental.

Thanks for the response. No apologies needed, mapping contributions like yours are obviously a big help for the project.

About big changesets:
If everything is mapped correctly, then there is no problem, I guess.

However, if mistakes are made (which we're unfortunately prone to as humans), then smaller changesets certainly make it easier to isolate and understand these mistakes and potentially perform rollbacks without destroying a lot of correct mapping as a side effect.

----

I would think that -- ideally -- one changeset should be not more than a few buildings, each in the same block or neighbourhood. In practice, this is often not the case (including my own changesets), but that's what I have in mind when i try to map "cleanly".

Great!

Thanks for clarifying.

How about bicycle=yes instead? (unless there is a bicycle sign)

Hi,
Thanks for your contribution.

This changeset spans the entire city.

Could you try to create smaller changesets in order to make it easier for others to understand what you're doing?

Cheers

Hi,
highway=steps + bicycle=designated appears a bit odd. Perhaps a tagging mistake?

way/940435513

I'd rather not add the address tags, but by no means am I sure about that. I've hence started a poll to ask the community for their opinion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/address-tags-on-bike-rental-stations-that-are-only-shown-in-app/

My considerations (in descending order of importance):
1) The address cannot be verified on the ground.
2) The wiki intends the addr:* tags to be used for buildings only (but this can be changed, obviously).
3) To "give a sense of location", data consumers can easily check the address of the building closest to the station.

Hi,
I noticed that you add address tags to car sharing stations. I'm wondering: Is this verifiable in some way (i. e. can it be demonstrated to be true or false)? For example, is the address written on an information board at the station or something?

Hi,
Could you help with this note?
note/3720678

Hi,
Could you help with this note?
note/3720678

This seems to be a clear case for grade4. I don't see a good reason for using an undocumented tag in this case.