OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179832574

You changed area around from construction, but didn't retag building - it was building=construction. I fixed that.
But I'm not sure about road on the south - is it still under construction?

179718741

I would be very surprised if only one was changed. Will remove notes from the stops now.

177272740

Hi rusjanis,
I noticed that you've be splitting this street in smaller segments for the purpose of adding turn restrictions in multiple places.
It seems like while doing so new segments are not included in bike paths (EV10 in this case). I don't know what could cause this, maybe large size of the relation?
Anyway, I re-added all missing segments, so nothing from your side, just an FYI)

179718741

Both stops have notes on them saying `Rigassatiksme's site says that this stop is called "Anniņmuižas Jaunā pamatskola", but sigh still says "Anniņmuižas vidusskola"`

Was the name changed on the bus stop signs?
If so, notes should have been removed. If not - renaming shouldn't have been happened.

Also, as an aside, just putting a word "исправление" into comment is not particularly useful to anyone, and effectively is same as an empty message

179589397

Looks good.
Also updated building outline, since it was rebuilt. But service/living roads behind it need survey.

179543935

Thank you!

179543935

You are completely right.
I always forget about landuse other than construction. Can you revert this changeset, please?

164339668

Seems like this changeset duplicated a bunker in Grīziņkalns: note/5188493

178951001

After discussion in OSM's chat, and since your approach seems to be the best what is currently possible with existing tooling, I would like to retract my request of you stopping: please proceed with creation of route=road at will.

Link to the discussion for reference: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/358602-general/topic/Road.20routes/

179105761

Don't know about Potlatch, never seen it even in screenshots.
But iD is definitely superior to JOSM for casual stuff - you just start editing, no need to download something, sync something, etc.
And IT people are famously lazy))

179105761

That's exactly what I meant: iD is enough for what I usually do (and even more for what I understand how to do).
JOSM has quite a learning curve, so much so that on my first attempt I capitulated in just 15 minutes. So I'm not sure if learning how to use it worth it for me, at this time.
Also, with great power comes great responsibility, and all of that =) Not sure on that part too.

179105761

Ohh, right, JOSM.
One day I'll overcome myself to start using it. But not today.

179105761

Yeah, I understand that it's better to use original, but I didn't know it's possible to restore it after deletions (without reverting whole delete changeset).
Please show me the magic you used

179105761

Good point. I assumed that anybody would check street level photos, but more I think about that, more I see how bad of an assumption this is.
I'll add was:amenity=parking shortly

178951001

So, as I understand, you are trying to work around the limitation of wikipedia's map plugin by creating relations in OSM. This is a wrong path.
Please create route=road only where it is really necessary.

And if you still really want to have full outline of the street, you might go GeoJSON route. Extraction of GeoJSON for embedding in wikipedia can be done with tools like https://overpass-turbo.eu

178951001

Why are you creating all these relations?
Tag description for `route=road` says that "Most urban streets and minor roads which are identified only by a `name=*` tag do not belong to a relation.": route=road

160474396

I was more interested in understanding why that happened, in case if I misunderstood something, to be honest)

But in general, I think no, it shouldn't.
As far as I understand, current signs allow regular vehicles to use this space as a turn around, for example.

Also, as an example, similar space at Dzelzavas way/91758798 has 301 sign:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1384660526531744

160474396

Why did you tag entrance to the depo as `motor_vehicle=no`?
It has 523. sign, which as far as I understand means that cars can enter there, just not allowed to stop. Or do I misunderstand meaning of that sign?

163452076

No worries.
I'm trying to revitalise Osmalyzer, and it actually noticed this)

163452076

Actually, I found photo from 09.2025: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1460316635177126
It's still a parking machine. Will retag it back.