markalex-'s Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179832574 | You changed area around from construction, but didn't retag building - it was building=construction. I fixed that.
|
|
| 179718741 | I would be very surprised if only one was changed. Will remove notes from the stops now. |
|
| 177272740 | Hi rusjanis,
|
|
| 179718741 | Both stops have notes on them saying `Rigassatiksme's site says that this stop is called "Anniņmuižas Jaunā pamatskola", but sigh still says "Anniņmuižas vidusskola"` Was the name changed on the bus stop signs?
Also, as an aside, just putting a word "исправление" into comment is not particularly useful to anyone, and effectively is same as an empty message |
|
| 179589397 | Looks good.
|
|
| 179543935 | Thank you! |
|
| 179543935 | You are completely right.
|
|
| 164339668 | Seems like this changeset duplicated a bunker in Grīziņkalns: note/5188493 |
|
| 178951001 | After discussion in OSM's chat, and since your approach seems to be the best what is currently possible with existing tooling, I would like to retract my request of you stopping: please proceed with creation of route=road at will. Link to the discussion for reference: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/358602-general/topic/Road.20routes/ |
|
| 179105761 | Don't know about Potlatch, never seen it even in screenshots.
|
|
| 179105761 | That's exactly what I meant: iD is enough for what I usually do (and even more for what I understand how to do).
|
|
| 179105761 | Ohh, right, JOSM.
|
|
| 179105761 | Yeah, I understand that it's better to use original, but I didn't know it's possible to restore it after deletions (without reverting whole delete changeset).
|
|
| 179105761 | Good point. I assumed that anybody would check street level photos, but more I think about that, more I see how bad of an assumption this is.
|
|
| 178951001 | So, as I understand, you are trying to work around the limitation of wikipedia's map plugin by creating relations in OSM. This is a wrong path.
And if you still really want to have full outline of the street, you might go GeoJSON route. Extraction of GeoJSON for embedding in wikipedia can be done with tools like https://overpass-turbo.eu |
|
| 178951001 | Why are you creating all these relations?
|
|
| 160474396 | I was more interested in understanding why that happened, in case if I misunderstood something, to be honest) But in general, I think no, it shouldn't.
Also, as an example, similar space at Dzelzavas way/91758798 has 301 sign:
|
|
| 160474396 | Why did you tag entrance to the depo as `motor_vehicle=no`?
|
|
| 163452076 | No worries.
|
|
| 163452076 | Actually, I found photo from 09.2025: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1460316635177126
|