Hola Guido y Rick!
as Rick (with a huge understatement) says: the boundaries he broke were flawed. IIUC, they were contributed by a user who in all good faith copied from the Panamanian National Geographic Institute IGNTG, but when he did that he didn't integrate his contributions with the already existing information. as OSM we do not have the right to copy from the IGNTG information, but his contributions were too old to just revert. the DWG knows about it, and does not give it priority (my bad: I've asked their help too often).
Rick is giving priority to mapping what is visible on the ground.
some of my past corrections were educated guesswork, I do not insist in having them back.

so much detail leaves me a bit perplex. I have been on this island a couple of times, have you too? care to share your point of view with the local community? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61

hola. quisieras presentar tus contribuciones muy detalladas a la comunidad local? tenemos un foro "oficial": https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113131041

Oh, sorry, veo que es lo que hiciste. Comenté basado en el comentario, no en el contenido.

Hola! "to contribute to the enrichment of my district", a very effective way not available to remote mappers, you could contribute names of points of interest. Like shops, restaurants, and all sorts of services that one finds in a town like Aguadulce! Thanks for anything you manage to add to our database!

Hola. Would you mind being more clear with your changeset comments? Like using a verb and an object specifying what you contributed. The "where" we can see from the extent of the changeset. Thank you.

Prior to this changeset, limits of municipalities ignored limits of province. It is a fair question that you are asking.

a better description, at least as far as the edits in Peru are concerned, might be "adding/refining roads, reclassifying, adding several access gates and specifying their access property for the road behind them". it feels weird to me that the gate should have access=permissive and the road access=private.

if you are in a group, you start a discussion within the group, trying to get other people involved.
without a group, you just start using the new tag as if you had reached an agreement with your own head.
you would also ask for review to your edits, and you might engage in discussion on a forum, help site, or mailing list.
if we were in a discussion/chat, I might put on the table "unesco:endangered:<date-of-start>-<date-of-end>"
osm.wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_namespace_suffix_as_.22keyname:DATESPEC.3D...22

Hi. you still do remember what was the function of these installations? you made them all "building" and partially described them in their names … osm.wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
(es ist ok, auf Deutsch zu antworten.)

hi. is there a standard tag for "in danger according to the UNESCO"? we could use that instead of adding text to the 'note' value.

Hola, gracias por contribuir al mapa OSM. es una casualidad que justamente en estos días estaba revisando la misma zona … como nuevo mapero quizás no conoces el foro? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61

hi, yep, you're right, I should keep the old or alternative name in the correct field.
»Please go back and adjust your edits accordingly for the community« (I'll do so shortly.)
Do I understand you Kaart correctly, that you believe in having the same mapper correct their own mistakes?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73832

Otra cosa: en la base de datos deberíamos poner los nombres sin abreviación: cortar "avenida" en "av." es algo que dejamos a los software de renderizado.

Las calles numeradas corren igual como por ejemplo a Calle 38. Desde la Calle 42 y hasta la Calle 50 están algo más torcidas. no sé cómo corren la 46, 47, 48 y 49 y para eso sería genial si pudieras recoger información in situ, quizás con Mapillary?
Ten en cuenta que existen etiquetas "alt_name", "loc_name", "official_name", o sea que no hace falta borrar información y Avenida 4 Sur ya está en los campos alt_name y old_name.
En Panamá el valor 'trunk' lo tenemos reservado a la Panamericana.
Para aclarar dudas, tenemos un grupo Telegram no oficial, y un foro oficial OSM.

bueno, pero todo el mundo la llama Calle 50, así que la volví a mejorar.
revisa el sitio de King's Food, y la información de la Clínica Boyd.
vives en la zona?

hey. I really fail to understand the reason and the source and the necessity to fill in gaps by inventing information. you wrote Calle 46 Este for a road called Calle Venezuela.
source? reason? necessity?
thanks.

https://scontent.fsyq4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/117594482_188389549304717_5611574040763401644_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=e3f864&_nc_ohc=ZBQZjyzrke8AX_Kt3w0&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyq4-1.fna&oh=7c63519b2d526ef4c56260c4bf5eeebb&oe=6195E9C5

hola. creo que esto esté mal, pues "King's food" se encuentra en la calle 50 y este sector de la calle 50 ahora la has llamado "Av 4 Sur", "trunk" (ni más ni menos que la Panamericana).
Quieres apoyo para mapear mejor?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93739864

hola Alvarado2510, una pregunta a propósito del "Minisuper Mercadito Miranda": lo pusiste dentro de un "building=house" o sea edificio dedicado a vivienda, de un solo piso. Puedes validar la información? podría ser que es un edificio "genérico", o sea "building=yes"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112719808