every user I've asked about the ref they were adding, all answered as you just did.

proof it's incorrect, no.
evidence of any ref in the country, none at all apart for ref=1.

hi. have any chance you can share the source for the 'ref'?

la calle 857002238 no existe, sólo se trata de un carril de preselección de giro en la Panamericana.

Rafael Avila Coya te escribió el 24 de agosto del 2021, de parte del DWG, urgiéndote a que te pusieras en contacto conmigo, y mejor diría yo, con el resto de los editores OSM.
En la misma fecha me escribió:
»Esperaremos un tiempo prudencial a que conteste, antes de pensar en otras medidas para llevar este asunto a buen puerto."
boh?

hola. revisa por favor tu página osmose (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/Brayan%20Ameth?level=2) con referencia al error "Restriction relation, wrong number of members".
unos de ellos son errores introducidos en este conjunto de cambios.
gracias.

hola. this "Edit" has changed some correctly tagged residential roads to "track". please review the guidelines on road classification for "non-rich-western" countries osm.wiki/ES:Highway_Tag_Africa

hola. acuérdate que si la función es residencial, no cambia la clasificación de la calle. la condición de la calle se representa en otros campos, no en su clasificación.
"Las condiciones de las rutas no siempre coinciden con su rol económico y social. Una clasificación de rutas tiene que ser el resultado de la reflexión de la importancia de la ruta, no en la superficie o el aspecto visual de la ruta"
osm.wiki/ES:Highway_Tag_Africa

hi. this looks like an import, and of impressively bad quality. what is going on here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121645665

changeset/122480049
this is my interpretation of how to do it better. please have a look, hope you agree, or let me know what you consider an improvement.

hola. thanks for adding valuable information. about bus stops: you have added some as this one (node/9686577910), some like this other (node/9686577911).
I think it's better to have all like the first one (bus=yes; highway=bus_stop; public_transport=platform), with the optional information regarding bench and shelter, all associated to the same Node object, as for example (node/7546753582)

overpass query to find public_transport platform inside public_transport platform:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jml

with this changeset you added several objects of type way, tagged as bus=yes; public_transport=platform, where we already had nodes (Way: 1069427290). this is a violation of the DRY principle (don't repeat yourself), which, within OSM, is the guideline 'one object for one feature' osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

his "ah bueno" reply meant in practice "I give up mapping (for the time being)". Now almost 2 years later he is back mapping with precisely the same style: not describing the content of his edits, adding roads where there's lanes, undoing minor edits which in the meanwhile I had done on his contributions, as in a typical edit war.

mapper came back with same mapping style and non descriptive changeset comments. i hope to find a viable compromise, after all, we just care for quality, we only need to understand what is best for OSM.

changeset/90002845
(Please don't use the same changeset comment "Actualizacion de los datos" every time - it doesn't help people to understand what you changed or why) (a kind request by a DWG member).

hola y nuevamente por favor no añadas vías que no existen nada más para facilitarle el trabajo al navegador. hay otras maneras. te he mencionado ejemplos, utilizando turn:lanes, y te he invitado a preguntar en la comunidad.

también hay esfuerzos dentro de Latam para alcanzar algo de formación de comunidad. osm.wiki/ES:LatAm

most of this users additions look as imports. according to Pascal Neis' web site, in 18 Mapping days RobertReynolds contributed 61 changesets, totalling 254,847
Map changes, for an average above 4 thousand changes per changeset.

it does not impact me, I just noticed this user in the Nicaragua statistics.

hi. I'm sure this was a random mistake, but please do try to improve these two points:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments